From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, opurdila@ixiacom.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
nhorman@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net,
ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [Patch 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:52:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC2C34B.50109@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004092221.GEE32059.FHMOFVLJOFSOtQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Amerigo Wang wrote:
>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>> @@ -1980,6 +1980,8 @@ retry:
>> /* FIXME: add proper port randomization per like inet_csk_get_port */
>> do {
>> ret = idr_get_new_above(ps, bind_list, next_port, &port);
>> + if (inet_is_reserved_local_port(port))
>> + ret = -EAGAIN;
>
> You should not overwrite ret with -EAGAIN when idr_get_new_above() returned
> -ENOSPC. I don't know about idr, thus I don't know whether
>
> if (!ret && inet_is_reserved_local_port(port))
> ret = -EAGAIN;
>
> is correct or not.
Hmm, good catch! I think it is correct.
>
>> } while ((ret == -EAGAIN) && idr_pre_get(ps, GFP_KERNEL));
>>
>> if (ret)
>> @@ -2996,10 +2998,13 @@ static int __init cma_init(void)
>> {
>> int ret, low, high, remaining;
>>
>> - get_random_bytes(&next_port, sizeof next_port);
>> inet_get_local_port_range(&low, &high);
>> +again:
>> + get_random_bytes(&next_port, sizeof next_port);
>> remaining = (high - low) + 1;
>> next_port = ((unsigned int) next_port % remaining) + low;
>> + if (inet_is_reserved_local_port(next_port))
>> + goto again;
>>
>
> You should not unconditionally "goto again;".
> If all ports were reserved, it will loop forever (CPU stalls).
>
Yeah, how about:
int tries = 10;
...
again:
...
if (inet_is_reserved_local_port(next_port)) {
if (tries--)
goto again;
else
return -EBUSY;
}
?
>> cma_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("rdma_cm");
>> if (!cma_wq)
>
>
>> Index: linux-2.6/net/sctp/socket.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/net/sctp/socket.c
>> +++ linux-2.6/net/sctp/socket.c
>> @@ -5436,6 +5436,8 @@ static long sctp_get_port_local(struct s
>> rover++;
>> if ((rover < low) || (rover > high))
>> rover = low;
>> + if (inet_is_reserved_local_port(rover))
>> + continue;
>
> This one needs to be
>
> if (inet_is_reserved_local_port(rover))
> goto next_nolock;
>
>> index = sctp_phashfn(rover);
>> head = &sctp_port_hashtable[index];
>> sctp_spin_lock(&head->lock);
>
> next:
> sctp_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> +next_nolock:
> } while (--remaining > 0);
>
> otherwise, it will loop forever if all ports were reserved.
Sorry, doesn't 'continue' jump to exactly where 'next_nolock' is??
Or I am missing something?
Thanks for your review!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-12 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-09 10:10 [Patch v7 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Amerigo Wang
2010-04-09 10:11 ` [Patch 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code Amerigo Wang
2010-04-09 10:49 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-09 13:40 ` Octavian Purdila
2010-04-12 6:30 ` Cong Wang
2010-04-09 10:11 ` [Patch 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap Amerigo Wang
2010-04-09 10:33 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-09 12:35 ` Octavian Purdila
2010-04-12 6:32 ` Cong Wang
2010-04-09 10:11 ` [Patch 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Amerigo Wang
2010-04-09 13:21 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-04-12 6:52 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2010-04-12 7:06 ` Tetsuo Handa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-12 10:03 [Patch v8 0/3] " Amerigo Wang
2010-04-12 10:04 ` [Patch 3/3] " Amerigo Wang
2010-04-13 1:21 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-04-13 7:13 ` Cong Wang
2010-04-13 8:48 ` Cong Wang
2010-04-13 13:07 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-04-13 16:32 ` Sean Hefty
2010-04-30 8:25 [Patch v9 0/3] " Amerigo Wang
2010-04-30 8:25 ` [Patch 3/3] " Amerigo Wang
2010-05-05 10:26 [Patch v10 0/3] " Amerigo Wang
2010-05-05 10:27 ` [Patch 3/3] " Amerigo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BC2C34B.50109@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).