From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: HTB - What's the minimal value for 'rate' parameter? Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 23:01:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4BCA21C0.60709@gmail.com> References: <4BBE4BB4.1060209@gmail.com> <20100409212657.GA3560@del.dom.local> <4BC63766.5080104@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Antonio Almeida , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, davem@davemloft.net, devik@cdi.cz To: Benny Amorsen Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:32800 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755194Ab0DQVCA (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:02:00 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1056928fga.1 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:01:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Benny Amorsen wrote, On 04/17/2010 11:19 AM: > Jarek Poplawski writes: > >> As I wrote before, the minimal (overflow safe) rate depends on max >> packet size, and for 1500 byte it would be something around: >> 1500b/2min, so if your clients can wait so long, try this: > > Wouldn't it be nice of either tc or the kernel to warn about wrong > configurations, or possibly reject them completely? ...or have it documented etc. Acked-by: Jarek P. ;-)