From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hughes Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] X25: Use identifiers for X25 to device interface Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:08:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4BCAE84A.2030701@Calva.COM> References: <1271584310.6280.425.camel@ibex> <4BCAE509.9000209@Calva.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Hendry , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: John Hughes Return-path: Received: from oceanic.CalvaEDI.COM ([89.202.194.168]:41892 "EHLO oceanic.CalvaEDI.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756833Ab0DRLJF (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Apr 2010 07:09:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BCAE509.9000209@Calva.COM> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: John Hughes wrote: > Shouldn't you use explicit values here? > > enum { > X25_IFACE_DATA = 0x00, /* explicit value for ABI stability */ > ... Oh, and is net/x25device.h suitable for inclusion from user space (xotd for example)?