From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:48:22 -0700 Message-ID: <4BD5FC16.4070402@hp.com> References: <20100426.112244.260086869.davem@davemloft.net> <4BD5F553.6020006@hp.com> <20100426.134051.232750473.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: therbert@google.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from g4t0014.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.17]:6991 "EHLO g4t0014.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755198Ab0DZUsZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:48:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100426.134051.232750473.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > From: Rick Jones > Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:19:31 -0700 > > >>As a networking guy I can see why it seems baffling, but stepping out >>of myself and thinking like the customers with whom I've interacted >>over the years, it is not baffling at all. > > > > And hey nobody is using SCTP either, that's right, nobody... > > > Look, don't try to defend this abomination of a situation with some > "customers only use TCP" argument. It only makes the situation look > even more absurd. Do not confuse explanation with endorsement. rick