From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ptp: Added a brand new class driver for ptp clocks.
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:57:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BDFD382.1010309@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100503100754.GA30417@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
On 05/03/2010 12:07 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 12:50:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>
>> As long as the device is in use by an application, no other can access
>> it, because the mutex is locked. Other application may want to read the
>> PTP clock time while ptpd is running, though.
>
> Yes, of course. I implemented it that way just to get started. I first
> want to concentrate on getting the basic drivers in place (still have
> IXP46x and Phyter to do), and then on the ancillary features, like
> timers, time stamping external inputs, and so on.
>
> I understand that some fine grained access control to the PTP clock
> woul be nice to have, but I am not sure exactly what would work best,
> and I would like to save that decision for later...
OK, fair enough.
> However, if you have some ideas, please take a look at the list of
> features in the docu, and explain how you would like the access
> control to work.
The fine grain locking for set/get properties is tricky. I personally
would just require "CAP_SYS_TIME" for setting properties and a
spin_lock_irq* to protect against concurrent access, just like for
setting/getting system clock properties.
> Or better yet, post a patch ;)
Would do if we could agree on the solution mentioned above.
Wolfgang.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-29 9:19 [PATCH 1/3] ptp: Added a brand new class driver for ptp clocks Richard Cochran
2010-04-30 17:58 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-05-01 14:08 ` Richard Cochran
2010-05-01 14:09 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-05-02 10:50 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-05-03 10:07 ` Richard Cochran
2010-05-04 7:57 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-27 9:14 Richard Cochran
2010-04-27 20:07 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 22:32 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-04-28 6:08 ` Richard Cochran
2010-04-28 15:45 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BDFD382.1010309@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).