From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
ebiederm@xmission.com, adobriyan@gmail.com,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 17:20:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE13872.6050500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE0E27C.7040200@redhat.com>
Cong Wang wrote:
> Changli Gao wrote:
>> add the following lines to let "echo 1-10 >>
>> /proc/..." work as normal.
>
> Hmm, I haven't tested this, what did you see if we append
> lines into it?
>
> Also, do we need appending lines to this /proc file when design it?
> Octavian? Eric?
>
Hmm, currently this behaves like other /proc files, IOW,
echo 'foo' >> /proc/XXX is the same with echo 'foo' > /proc/XXX.
I think it is reasonable for bitmap /proc files to have
echo 'foo' >> /proc/XXX behaves like non-proc files, that is
appending numbers into that file, like what Changli mentioned.
Any objections?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-05 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-30 8:25 [Patch v9 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Amerigo Wang
2010-04-30 8:25 ` [Patch 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code Amerigo Wang
2010-04-30 22:49 ` Changli Gao
2010-05-05 3:02 ` Cong Wang
2010-04-30 8:25 ` [Patch 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap Amerigo Wang
2010-04-30 22:41 ` Changli Gao
2010-05-05 3:14 ` Cong Wang
2010-05-05 9:20 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2010-04-30 8:25 ` [Patch 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Amerigo Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-05 10:26 [Patch v10 0/3] " Amerigo Wang
2010-05-05 10:26 ` [Patch 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap Amerigo Wang
2010-04-12 10:03 [Patch v8 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Amerigo Wang
2010-04-12 10:04 ` [Patch 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap Amerigo Wang
2010-04-09 10:10 [Patch v7 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Amerigo Wang
2010-04-09 10:11 ` [Patch 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap Amerigo Wang
2010-04-09 10:33 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-09 12:35 ` Octavian Purdila
2010-04-12 6:32 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE13872.6050500@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).