netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	xiaosuo@gmail.com, adobriyan@gmail.com,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v10 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 12:01:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE7851D.2090304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100505103033.5600.77502.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

(Adding Andrew into Cc, hope can hear from him.)

On 05/05/10 18:26, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> Changes from the previous version:
> - Use 'true' and 'false' for bool's;
> - Fix some coding style problems;
> - Allow appending lines to bitmap proc file so that it will be
>    easier to add new bits.
>
> ------------------>
>
> This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports which
> allows users to reserve ports for third-party applications.
>
> The reserved ports will not be used by automatic port assignments
> (e.g. when calling connect() or bind() with port number 0). Explicit
> port allocation behavior is unchanged.
>
> There are still some miss behaviors with regard to proc parsing in odd
> invalid cases (for "40000\0-40001" all is acknowledged but only 40000
> is accepted) but they are not easy to fix without changing the current
> "acknowledge how much we accepted" behavior.
>
> Because of that and because the same issues are present in the
> existing proc_dointvec code as well I don't think its worth holding
> the actual feature (port reservation) after such petty error recovery
> issues.
>
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-10  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-05 10:26 [Patch v10 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Amerigo Wang
2010-05-05 10:26 ` [Patch 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code Amerigo Wang
2010-05-05 10:26 ` [Patch 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap Amerigo Wang
2010-05-05 10:27 ` [Patch 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Amerigo Wang
2010-05-10  4:01 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2010-05-16  6:28 ` [Patch v10 0/3] " David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BE7851D.2090304@redhat.com \
    --to=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).