From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@cisco.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: change bridge/macvlan hook to be be generic
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:14:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE83F02.3010204@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C80610E0.2E2EC%scofeldm@cisco.com>
On 05/04/2010 05:58 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On 5/4/10 3:37 PM, "Stephen Hemminger"<shemminger@vyatta.com> wrote:
>
>> The existing macvlan and bridge have special hooks in the packet input
>> path. This patch changes it to a generic hook chain, like the packet type
>> processing. I have been wanting to look into flow based switching, etc...
>
> Can this be further simplified by saying that a netdev can only be hooked by
> one mux (macvlan, bridge, etc) at any given time, so there is never more
> than one element in the hook chain. If so, then we just need a single hook,
> not a chain.
>
> It seems odd to me that a dev would have both macvlan_port != NULL and
> br_port != NULL. Can dev be in a macvlan and a bridge at the same time?
If we did add the generic hook list, then we could support other hooks, like
a pktgen rx hook to gather latency, pkt-loss, and similar stats, for example.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-10 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-04 22:37 [RFC] net: change bridge/macvlan hook to be be generic Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-05 0:58 ` Scott Feldman
2010-05-10 15:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-10 17:14 ` Ben Greear [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE83F02.3010204@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scofeldm@cisco.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).