From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?S3J6eXN6dG9mIE9sxJlkemtp?= Subject: Re: bnx2/BCM5709: why 5 interrupts on a 4 core system (2.6.33.3) Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 16:55:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4BF2AA55.5050100@ans.pl> References: <1274040928.2299.17.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4BF056F0.8010008@ans.pl> <1274042826.2299.26.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4BF05FC2.4020804@ans.pl> <1274045180.2299.38.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4BF2A288.7040304@ans.pl> <1274192761.8274.3.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Michael Chan , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from bizon.gios.gov.pl ([195.187.34.71]:57461 "EHLO bizon.gios.gov.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757872Ab0EROzX (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 10:55:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1274192761.8274.3.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2010-05-18 16:26, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le mardi 18 mai 2010 =C3=A0 16:22 +0200, Krzysztof Ol=C4=99dzki a =C3= =A9crit : > >> Thank you. What happens if I set it to a lower/bigger value, than >> avaliable txqueues in a NIC? > > lower values -> same situation than today (not all txqueues will be > used) > > bigger values -> it will be capped, so its only a bit more ram > allocated. So it is safe to put there little bigger value than needed. Thanks. Best regards, Krzysztof Ol=C4=99dzki