From: "Krzysztof Olędzki" <ole@ans.pl>
To: eilong@broadcom.com
Cc: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>,
Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bnx2x + SFP+ DA/2.6.33.3: Got bad status 0x0 when reading from SFP+ EEPROM -> SFP+ module is not initialized
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 18:43:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BF6B84D.6050600@ans.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF68854.5060409@ans.pl>
On 2010-05-21 15:19, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote:
> On 2010-05-21 14:58, Eilon Greenstein wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:54 -0700, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote:
>>> On 2010-05-20 22:25, Rick Jones wrote:
>>>> Some simple/simplistic thoughts/questions...
>>>>
>>>> Has the DAC been used successfully prior to this?
>>>
>>> Yes. It was successfully used to connect two HP switches, before I
>>> received SFP+ SR modules, that allowed me to put the switches into
>>> distanced rooms.
>>
>> Krzysztof,
>>
>> I would like to check in what speed the I2C is running at, and while we
>> are there, to make sure it is at low speed (100KHz and not 400KHz). Can
>> you please add this patch and let me know what you see:
>
> Sure.
>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2x_link.c b/drivers/net/bnx2x_link.c
>
> <CUT>
>
> [bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth4)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
> [bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth5)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
>
>> Since we are already off for the weekend, I couldn't find a machine with
>> this kind of board to test it for myself. On top of that, I don't have
>> this type of DAC cable, so I need your help in this debug process.
>
> No problem. There is no need to ask for a help a person who depends on
> your support. ;) I would like to solve it as soon as possible so I'm
> willing to test everything you send me. ;)
Hello again,
To make sure the NICs are OK I made a test and plugged a SFP+ SR module (HP J9150A):
[bnx2x_8727_handle_mod_abs:4639(eth4)]MOD_ABS indication show module is present
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth4)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2835(eth4)]Got bad status 0x0 when reading from SFP+ EEPROM
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth4)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2835(eth4)]Got bad status 0x0 when reading from SFP+ EEPROM
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth4)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2835(eth4)]Got bad status 0x0 when reading from SFP+ EEPROM
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth4)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2835(eth4)]Got bad status 0x0 when reading from SFP+ EEPROM
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth4)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2835(eth4)]Got bad status 0x0 when reading from SFP+ EEPROM
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth4)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
[bnx2x_wait_for_sfp_module_initialized:3138(eth4)]SFP+ module initialization took 25 ms
[bnx2x_sfp_module_detection:3197(eth4)]SFP+ module plugged in/out detected on port 0
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth4)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
[bnx2x_get_edc_mode:2930(eth4)]Optic module detected
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth4)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
[bnx2x_get_edc_mode:2954(eth4)]EDC mode is set to 0x44
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth4)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
[bnx2x_8727_read_sfp_module_eeprom:2774(eth4)]I2C 2W speed 0x0, bit 8 0
bnx2x: Warning: Unqualified SFP+ module detected on eth4, Port 0 from MergeOptics GmbH part number TRX10GVP2010CA01
[bnx2x_sfp_module_detection:3205(eth4)]Module verification failed!!
So, both NICs and SFP+ DA cables are OK. The only problem we have is to make them talk together. :|
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-21 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-20 17:08 bnx2x + SFP+ DA/2.6.33.3: Got bad status 0x0 when reading from SFP+ EEPROM -> SFP+ module is not initialized Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-05-20 17:49 ` Eilon Greenstein
[not found] ` <4BF57ADF.1060203@ans.pl>
2010-05-20 18:45 ` Eilon Greenstein
2010-05-20 19:41 ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-05-20 20:25 ` Rick Jones
2010-05-20 20:54 ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-05-21 12:58 ` Eilon Greenstein
2010-05-21 13:19 ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-05-21 16:43 ` Krzysztof Olędzki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BF6B84D.6050600@ans.pl \
--to=ole@ans.pl \
--cc=eilong@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).