From: Daniel Turull <daniel.turull@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, robert@herjulf.net, jens.laas@its.uu.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pktgen: receive packets and process incoming rate
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:28:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C065C7C.4000506@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275483650.2725.173.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 02 juin 2010 à 13:49 +0200, Daniel Turull a écrit :
>> This patch adds receiver part to pktgen taking advantages of SMP systems
>> with multiple rx queues:
>> - Creation of new proc file /proc/net/pktgen/pgrx to control and display the receiver.
>> - It uses PER-CPU variable to store the results per each CPU.
>> - Results displayed per CPU and aggregated.
>> - The packet handler is add in the protocols handlers (dev_Add_pack())
>> - Available statistics: packets and bytes received, work time and rate
>> - Only process pktgen packets
>> - It is possible to select the incoming interface
>> - Documentation updated with the new commands to control the receiver part.
>>
>
> Interesting, but does it belongs to pktgen ?
Yes, it allows to receive a feedback of pktgen of the traffic received which comes from pktgen. It is an addition for pktgen. By default is disabled.
> other comments included :)
>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Turull <daniel.turull@gmail.com>
>>
>
>
>>
>> +/*Recevier parameters per cpu*/
>> +struct pktgen_rx {
>> + u64 rx_packets; /*packets arrived*/
>
> unsigned long rx_packets ?
Yes, I used the same type as the number of packets send of the transmission size
struct pktgen_dev
__u64 sofar;
>> + u64 rx_bytes; /*bytes arrived*/
>> +
>> + ktime_t start_time; /*first time stamp of a packet*/
>> + ktime_t last_time; /*last packet arrival */
>> +};
>
>
>> +int pktgen_rcv_basic(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>> + struct packet_type *pt, struct net_device *orig_dev)
>> +{
>> + /* Check magic*/
>> + struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
>> + struct pktgen_hdr *pgh;
>> + void *vaddr;
>
> Following code is ... well ... interesting... But ...
>
> 1) Is it IPV6 compatable ? pktgen can be ipv6 or ipv4
It is not IPV6 compatible yet.
> 2) Is it resistant to malicious packets ? (very small ones)
I only tried with pktgen traffic
> 3) No checksum ?
The PKTGEN_MAGIC is checked in order to validate that is a pktgen packet
> I think you should use standard mechanisms... (pskb_may_pull(), ...)
> Take a look at __netpoll_rx() for an example.
>> + if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
>> + vaddr = kmap_skb_frag(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0]);
>> + pgh = (struct pktgen_hdr *)
>> + (vaddr+skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0].page_offset);
>> + } else {
>> + pgh = (struct pktgen_hdr *)(((char *)(iph)) + 28);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(pgh->pgh_magic != PKTGEN_MAGIC_NET))
>> + goto end;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(!__get_cpu_var(pktgen_rx_data).rx_packets))
>> + __get_cpu_var(pktgen_rx_data).start_time = ktime_now();
>> +
>> + __get_cpu_var(pktgen_rx_data).last_time = ktime_now();
>> +
>
> Its a bit suboptimal to use __get_cpu_var several time. Take a look at
> disassembly code :)
>
> Use a pointer instead
Ok, thanks for the advice. I will redo this part in order to make it compatabile with IPV6 and make it more optimal.
>
>> + /* Update counter of packets*/
>> + __get_cpu_var(pktgen_rx_data).rx_packets++;
>> + __get_cpu_var(pktgen_rx_data).rx_bytes += skb->len+14;
>
> This +14 seems suspect (what about vlan tags ?)
> Use ETH_HLEN instead at a very minimum?
This was added, in order to add the ethernet header in the bytes in order to have the same number in tx an rx, but yes I should use ETH_HLEN
>> +end:
>> + if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb))
>> + kunmap_skb_frag(vaddr);
>
> Should not recognised packets be allowed to flight in other parts of
> kernel stack ? This way, we could use ssh to remotely control this
> pktgen session ;)
This handler as a new packet type, but the packets are also delivered to the IP stack. It is possible to control the session with ssh.
>> + kfree_skb(skb);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-02 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-02 11:49 [PATCH 2/2] pktgen: receive packets and process incoming rate Daniel Turull
2010-06-02 13:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-02 13:28 ` Daniel Turull [this message]
2010-06-10 14:04 ` Daniel Turull
2010-06-10 14:05 ` Daniel Turull
2010-06-15 21:59 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C065C7C.4000506@gmail.com \
--to=daniel.turull@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.laas@its.uu.se \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert@herjulf.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).