From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@stealer.net>
Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Wensong Zhang <wensong@linux-vs.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Add missing locking during connection table hashing and unhashing
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:12:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0FA139.9030808@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1006080828290.18946@titan.stealer.net>
Sven Wegener wrote:
> The code that hashes and unhashes connections from the connection table
> is missing locking of the connection being modified, which opens up a
> race condition and results in memory corruption when this race condition
> is hit.
>
> Here is what happens in pretty verbose form:
>
> CPU 0 CPU 1
> ------------ ------------
> An active connection is terminated and
> we schedule ip_vs_conn_expire() on this
> CPU to expire this connection.
>
> IRQ assignment is changed to this CPU,
> but the expire timer stays scheduled on
> the other CPU.
>
> New connection from same ip:port comes
> in right before the timer expires, we
> find the inactive connection in our
> connection table and get a reference to
> it. We proper lock the connection in
> tcp_state_transition() and read the
> connection flags in set_tcp_state().
>
> ip_vs_conn_expire() gets called, we
> unhash the connection from our
> connection table and remove the hashed
> flag in ip_vs_conn_unhash(), without
> proper locking!
>
> While still holding proper locks we
> write the connection flags in
> set_tcp_state() and this sets the hashed
> flag again.
>
> ip_vs_conn_expire() fails to expire the
> connection, because the other CPU has
> incremented the reference count. We try
> to re-insert the connection into our
> connection table, but this fails in
> ip_vs_conn_hash(), because the hashed
> flag has been set by the other CPU. We
> re-schedule execution of
> ip_vs_conn_expire(). Now this connection
> has the hashed flag set, but isn't
> actually hashed in our connection table
> and has a dangling list_head.
>
> We drop the reference we held on the
> connection and schedule the expire timer
> for timeouting the connection on this
> CPU. Further packets won't be able to
> find this connection in our connection
> table.
>
> ip_vs_conn_expire() gets called again,
> we think it's already hashed, but the
> list_head is dangling and while removing
> the connection from our connection table
> we write to the memory location where
> this list_head points to.
>
> The result will probably be a kernel oops at some other point in time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@stealer.net>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> This race condition is pretty subtle, but it can be triggered remotely.
> It needs the IRQ assignment change or another circumstance where packets
> coming from the same ip:port for the same service are being processed on
> different CPUs. And it involves hitting the exact time at which
> ip_vs_conn_expire() gets called. It can be avoided by making sure that
> all packets from one connection are always processed on the same CPU and
> can be made harder to exploit by changing the connection timeouts to
> some custom values.
>
>
Applied, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-09 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-20 20:55 [PATCH] ipvs: Add missing locking during connection table hashing and unhashing Sven Wegener
2010-05-24 23:56 ` Simon Horman
2010-06-08 6:29 ` Sven Wegener
2010-06-09 14:12 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C0FA139.9030808@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sven.wegener@stealer.net \
--cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).