From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki Subject: Re: [PATCH] fragment: add fast path Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:15:17 +0900 Message-ID: <4C15BAE5.6010900@linux-ipv6.org> References: <1276470995-21713-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com> <20100613.181857.189703148.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xiaosuo@gmail.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@namei.org, kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from 94.43.138.210.xn.2iij.net ([210.138.43.94]:46931 "EHLO mail.st-paulia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750756Ab0FNFPz (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 01:15:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100613.181857.189703148.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: >> As the fragments are usually in order, > > In what universe does this happen "usually"? > > Linux has been outputting fragments in reverse order for more than 10 > years. > > I'm not applying this patch. Dave, I know we've been sending in reverse order, of course. And, as far as I know, it seems Linux is the only implementation which sends fragments in reverse order. This is receiving side. I think we should accept the fact that Linux is not the only implementation, no? --yoshfuji