From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [0/8] netpoll/bridge fixes Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:17:52 +0800 Message-ID: <4C175350.7090309@redhat.com> References: <20100610124047.GA16658@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100610074912.1303e3da@nehalam> <20100610215643.GA22048@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100610145915.721a86b7@nehalam> <20100610224839.GA22469@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100611021142.GA24490@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Qianfeng Zhang , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Matt Mackall To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58085 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754114Ab0FOKOJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:14:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100611021142.GA24490@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/11/10 10:11, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:48:39AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:59:15PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >>> >>> Okay, then add a comment where in_irq is used? >> >> Actually let me put it into a wrapper. I'll respin the patches. > > OK here is a repost. And this time it really is 8 patches :) > I've tested it lightly. > (Sorry for the delay, I was on vacation.) Thanks much for your nice work! Patch 1-7 look great for me, so, Reviewed-by: WANG Cong I don't quite understand patch 8, will reply to it separately. Thank you.