From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: add per bridge device controls for invoking iptables Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:34:15 +0200 Message-ID: <4C2D9677.3000505@trash.net> References: <1277729220-11775-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> <20100630142440.68adfdb1@nehalam> <20100630.142717.123424464.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:43682 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754950Ab0GBHeQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 03:34:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100630.142717.123424464.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > From: Stephen Hemminger > Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:24:40 -0700 > > >> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:47:00 +0200 >> kaber@trash.net wrote: >> >> >>> From: Patrick McHardy >>> >>> Support more fine grained control of bridge netfilter iptables invocation >>> by adding seperate brnf_call_*tables parameters for each device using the >>> sysfs interface. Packets are passed to layer 3 netfilter when either the >>> global parameter or the per bridge parameter is enabled. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy >>> >> Looks like a good idea. >> >> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger >> > > Acked-by: David S. Miller > > Patrick since this is mostly netfilter'ish, please toss it into one > of your trees. > Will do, thanks.