netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lennart Schulte <lennart.schulte@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Fehrmann, Henning" <henning.fehrmann@aei.mpg.de>,
	"Carsten Aulbert" <carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: oops in tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue() w/ v2.6.32.15
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:55:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C3F053F.7090704@nets.rwth-aachen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279195528.2496.2.camel@edumazet-laptop>

Since tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue also gets skb == NULL I'm pretty sure it 
is the same bug.
Up to now I only experienced the problem with ACK loss (without ACK loss 
the test ran about 30min without problems, with ACK loss it had paniced 
within 10min).
The data sender only has a HTB queue for traffic shaping (set to 20 
Mbit/s). The ACK loss is done by another router.
The setup looks like this. This way it seems to be the most realistic.

o sender with HTB
|
|
o netem queue for forward path delay
|
o netem queue for a queue limit
|
o netem queue for backward path delay
|
o netem queue for ACK loss
|
|
o receiver with HTB

Perhaps now it is a little big clearer.


On 15.07.2010 14:05, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le jeudi 15 juillet 2010 à 13:58 +0200, Lennart Schulte a écrit :
>    
>> I'm testing new reordering algorithms in a virtual testbed, that is the
>> nodes are emulated with xen and all the network parameters can be tuned
>> with queues.
>> With one of the algorithms I also got tracebacks which include
>> tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue. It only happens with ACK loss. The kernel
>> version however is 2.6.31.
>> When I read this thread I tried the debug patch and got the following:
>>
>> [ 2754.413150] NULL head, pkts 0
>> [ 2754.413156] Errors caught so far 1
>>
>> Hope that is of any help.
>>      
> Not sure I understand.
>
> Are you saying you reproduce same tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue()  bug, with
> a special tc qdisc/class droppping some ACK frames ?
>
> Could it be some sched problem and incorrect return codes in case of
> congestion ?
>    

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-15 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-08  8:22 oops in tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue() w/ v2.6.32.15 Tejun Heo
2010-07-11  2:36 ` David Miller
2010-07-11 16:09 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-07-11 17:06   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-11 17:46     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-11 18:29       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-11 19:22         ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-07-11 19:25           ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-07-11 19:44             ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-07-15 11:58   ` Lennart Schulte
2010-07-15 12:05     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-15 12:55       ` Lennart Schulte [this message]
2010-07-16 12:02         ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-07-16 12:25           ` Lennart Schulte
2010-07-16 13:19             ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-07-19  8:06               ` Lennart Schulte
2010-07-19 11:16                 ` [PATCHv2] tcp: fix crash in tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue Ilpo Järvinen
2010-07-19 14:09                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-19 17:25                     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-07-19 17:39                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-19 19:55                         ` David Miller
2010-07-20  8:33                           ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-07-19 14:57           ` oops in tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue() w/ v2.6.32.15 Tejun Heo
2010-07-20  8:41             ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-09-08  9:32             ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-09-08 10:25               ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-08 10:34                 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2010-09-09 10:27                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-09 10:45                     ` Ilpo Järvinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C3F053F.7090704@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
    --to=lennart.schulte@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
    --cc=carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=henning.fehrmann@aei.mpg.de \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).