From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs-iOnpLzIbIdM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
Linux Netdev List
<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: can: expected receive behavior broken
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:36:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C514BAE.4070201@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007281023.25039.matthias.fuchs-iOnpLzIbIdM@public.gmane.org>
On 28.07.2010 10:23, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> plx_pci/sja1000 + esd_usb2
>
Hi Matthias,
i added a test program to the SVN that checks whether the CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK and
CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS socket options work properly (in can.ko and can-raw-ko
and vcan.ko).
So far i was only able to test it on vcan0, as i'm on a business trip and
don't have a real CAN hardware with me.
I'll enhance it to force the CAN netdev to be given on the commandline.
Regarding your request, i was able to see the bad behaviour in the latest
net-next-2.6. You need to make
modprobe vcan echo=1
before creating vcan devices to test the loopback on driver level!
Invoking tst-rcv-own-msgs produces this output, which is far away from the
correct (wanted) output seen in the commit message below.
sockopt default
s : 0
t : 0
timeout
sockopt - -
timeout
sockopt - R
timeout
sockopt L -
s : 3
t : 3
timeout
sockopt L R
s : 4
t : 4
timeout
done.
I'll check that with the latest linux-2.6 (after rebooting :-)
Thanks for the hint! I'll run the tst-rcv-own-msgs test tool on the upcoming
net-next-2.6's and also put it into LTP later on.
Regards,
Oliver
--- snip! ---
Added:
trunk/test/tst-rcv-own-msgs.c
Modified:
trunk/test/Makefile
Log:
Added test programm to check the correct functionality of
CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK and CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS socket options.
It needs a vcan0 virtual CAN network interface and should produce an output
like this, when invoked:
sockopt default
t : 0
timeout
sockopt - -
timeout
sockopt - R
timeout
sockopt L -
t : 3
timeout
sockopt L R
s : 4
t : 4
timeout
done.
>
> On Wednesday 28 July 2010 10:17, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> On 07/28/2010 09:56 AM, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just noticed that the receive behavior of CAN sockets is broken
>>> in current net-next-2.6.
>>> I wrote some simple code that receives messages and echos them back to
>>> the bus. When I now trigger one single message on the bus, I get
>>> this message received and echoed back in an endless loop.
>>>
>>> I do not touch the sockopts CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK or CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS in my code.
>>> Only (!) setting CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK to 0 helps at the moment. But this behavior
>>> actually has nothing to do with LOOPBACK but more with RECV_OWN_MSGS.
>>
>> Sounds wired! What driver are you using?
>>
>> Wolfgang.
>>
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-29 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-28 7:56 can: expected receive behavior broken Matthias Fuchs
[not found] ` <201007280956.38957.matthias.fuchs-iOnpLzIbIdM@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-28 8:17 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
[not found] ` <4C4FE7AC.4010806-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-28 8:23 ` Matthias Fuchs
[not found] ` <201007281023.25039.matthias.fuchs-iOnpLzIbIdM@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-29 9:36 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
[not found] ` <4C514BAE.4070201-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-29 11:16 ` Oliver Hartkopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C514BAE.4070201@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan-fj+pqtutwrtk1umjsbkqmq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matthias.fuchs-iOnpLzIbIdM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).