netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@lhnet.ca>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@ixiacom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: allow netdev_wait_allrefs() to run faster
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:03:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6042E6.3060602@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100809174856.GS30010@kvack.org>

On 08/09/2010 10:48 AM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 10:44:14AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>> We also have a few rules per interface, and notice that it takes around 10ms
>> per rule when we are removing them, even when using batching in 'ip':
> ...
>> Patrick thought had an idea, but I don't think he had time to
>> look at it further:
>>
>> "Its probably the synchronize_rcu() in fib_nl_delrule() and
>> the route flushing happening after rule removal."
>
> Yes, that would be a problem, but the issue is deeper than that -- if I'm
> not mistaken it's on the packet processing path that iptables doesn't scale
> for 100k interfaces with 1 rule per interface.  It's been a while since I
> ran the tests, but I don't think it's changed much.

It would be nice to tie the rules based on 'iif' to a specific
interface.  Seems it should give near constant time lookup for rules
if we only have a few per interface....

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-09 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-17 22:18 [PATCH/RFC] make unregister_netdev() delete more than 4 interfaces per second Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-18  4:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-18 16:13   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-18 17:51     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-18 18:21       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-18 19:36         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-21 12:39         ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-21 15:40           ` [PATCH] net: allow netdev_wait_allrefs() to run faster Eric Dumazet
2009-10-21 16:09             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-21 16:51             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-21 19:54               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29 23:07               ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-29 23:38                 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-30  1:45                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-30 14:35                     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-30 14:43                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-30 23:25                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-30 23:53                         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-10-31  0:37                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-09 17:23                   ` Ben Greear
2010-08-09 17:34                     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2010-08-09 17:44                       ` Ben Greear
2010-08-09 17:48                         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2010-08-09 18:03                           ` Ben Greear [this message]
2010-08-09 19:59                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-09 21:03                         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2010-08-09 21:17                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-21 16:55             ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-23 21:13             ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24  4:35               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24  5:49                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24  8:49                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24 13:52                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24 14:24                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24 14:46                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-24 23:49                         ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-25  4:47                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-25  8:35                           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-25 15:19                             ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-25 19:28                               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-24 20:22                 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C6042E6.3060602@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=bcrl@lhnet.ca \
    --cc=cratiu@ixiacom.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).