From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] netxen: remove firmware exports Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:52:14 +0800 Message-ID: <4C6E423E.5080804@redhat.com> References: <20100818095908.6606.56224.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <99737F4847ED0A48AECC9F4A1974A4B80F86E69208@MNEXMB2.qlogic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "David S. Miller" , Dhananjay Phadke , Narender Kumar , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Amit Salecha Return-path: In-Reply-To: <99737F4847ED0A48AECC9F4A1974A4B80F86E69208@MNEXMB2.qlogic.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 08/19/10 17:12, Amit Salecha wrote: >> netxen_nic driver can store firmwares on flash, and get them porperly and >> dynamically, so the firmwares may not appear in /lib/firmware/. However, netxen_nic >> still exports these firmwares via modinfo, this makes our script which parses >> modinfo output fail. > > NX_UNIFIED_ROMIMAGE_NAME(phanfw.bin) is already submitted and we won't submit any other fw files. > >> -MODULE_FIRMWARE(NX_P2_MN_ROMIMAGE_NAME); >> -MODULE_FIRMWARE(NX_P3_CT_ROMIMAGE_NAME); >> -MODULE_FIRMWARE(NX_P3_MN_ROMIMAGE_NAME); > > It's not compulsory to submit firmware files which are exported (MODULE_FIRMWARE). > I am leaving this upto David to decide about this patch. > Okay. David, do you want me to submit an updated patch? Thanks! -- The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference. - Elie Wiesel