From: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "H.K. Jerry Chu" <hkchu@google.com>,
ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, davem@davemloft.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP_FAILFAST: a new socket option to timeout/abort a connection quicker
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:04:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C737D15.5060400@nets.rwth-aachen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282632262.2378.1681.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Am 24.08.2010 08:44, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> Le lundi 23 août 2010 à 23:20 -0700, H.K. Jerry Chu a écrit :
>> From: Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>
>>
>> This is a TCP level socket option that takes an unsigned int to specify
>> how long in ms TCP should resend a lost data packet before giving up
>> and returning ETIMEDOUT. The normal TCP retry/abort timeout limit still
>> applies. In other words this option is only meant for those applications
>> that need to "fail faster" than the default TCP timeout. The latter
>> may take upto 20 minutes in a normal WAN environment.
>>
>> The option is disabled (by default) when set to 0. Also it does not
>> apply during the connection establishment phase.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: H.K. Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>
>
> TCP_FAILFAST might be misleading. It reads as a boolean option, while
> its an option to cap the timeout, with a time unit, instead of the usual
> "number of retransmits".
Why not call it TCP_USERTIMEOUT?
Later you can also send it via the TCP user timeout option... (RFC5482)
Hmm... is the ms granularity really needed? Does it make sense to abort
a connection below a second?
> Its also funny you dont ask for a default value, given by a sysctl
> tunable ;)
Well retries1/2 would be the tunables, no?
Best regards,
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-24 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-24 6:20 [PATCH] TCP_FAILFAST: a new socket option to timeout/abort a connection quicker H.K. Jerry Chu
2010-08-24 6:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-24 8:04 ` Arnd Hannemann [this message]
2010-08-24 9:10 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-24 14:58 ` Arnd Hannemann
2010-08-24 16:28 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-24 22:13 ` Jerry Chu
2010-08-25 8:21 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-25 20:20 ` Jerry Chu
2010-08-25 22:59 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-26 1:49 ` Jerry Chu
2010-08-26 6:01 ` Lars Eggert
2010-08-26 7:12 ` Arnd Hannemann
2010-08-26 7:42 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-26 7:27 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-24 21:56 ` Jerry Chu
2010-08-24 20:47 ` Jerry Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C737D15.5060400@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
--to=hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hkchu@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).