From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Koki Sanagi Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] netdev: show a process of packets Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:12:53 +0900 Message-ID: <4C8083D5.200@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <4C72422C.5070102@jp.fujitsu.com> <1283212210.3656.84.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4C80592B.2060406@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100902.191741.233696520.davem@davemloft.net> <4C806388.9020509@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100903044656.GA6589@nowhere> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , rostedt@goodmis.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, scott.a.mcmillan@intel.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca To: Frederic Weisbecker Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100903044656.GA6589@nowhere> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org (2010/09/03 13:46), Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:55:04AM +0900, Koki Sanagi wrote: >> (2010/09/03 11:17), David Miller wrote: >>> From: Koki Sanagi >>> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:10:51 +0900 >>> >>>> Thanks many acks. and I have one question. >>>> >>>> These patches have several component. >>>> >>>> Patch1 is kernel component, but patch2-5 are netdev component. >>>> What tree is good to be included ? >>>> If it is not net-next, I must rebase to another tree. >>> >>> I would prefer it goes into the tracing tree or whatever is the most appropriate >>> for patch #1. >>> >> >> O.K. I'll rebase to linux-2.6-tip. > > > No need, they apply very well :) > > I'll push that to -tip soon. > > Thanks. > O.K. Thanks! Koki Sanagi.