From: Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@kernel.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andrew@beldisplaytech.com, ben@decadent.org.uk
Subject: suspend warning with 3c59x
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:32:40 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C8F9598.60309@kernel.org> (raw)
I have got a warning with the 3c59.
(reproduced with pm-suspend)
[ 254.214993] 3c59x 0000:00:0d.0: PME# enabled
[ 254.215021] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:94
[ 254.215030] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 4875, name: ethtool
[ 254.215042] Pid: 4875, comm: ethtool Tainted: G W 2.6.36-rc3+ #7
[ 254.215049] Call Trace:
[ 254.215050] [] __might_sleep+0xb1/0xb6
[ 254.215050] [] mutex_lock+0x17/0x30
[ 254.215050] [] acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power+0x2b/0xb1
[ 254.215050] [] acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake+0x42/0x7f
[ 254.215050] [] acpi_pci_sleep_wake+0x5d/0x63
[ 254.215050] [] platform_pci_sleep_wake+0x1d/0x20
[ 254.215050] [] __pci_enable_wake+0x90/0xd0
[ 254.215050] [] acpi_set_WOL+0x8e/0xf5 [3c59x]
[ 254.215050] [] vortex_set_wol+0x4e/0x5e [3c59x]
[ 254.215050] [] dev_ethtool+0x1cf/0xb61
[ 254.215050] [] ? debug_mutex_free_waiter+0x45/0x4a
[ 254.215050] [] ? __mutex_lock_common+0x204/0x20e
[ 254.215050] [] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x12/0x15
[ 254.215050] [] ? mutex_lock+0x23/0x30
[ 254.215050] [] dev_ioctl+0x42c/0x533
[ 254.215050] [] ? _cond_resched+0x8/0x1c
[ 254.215050] [] ? lock_page+0x1c/0x30
[ 254.215050] [] ? page_address+0x15/0x7c
[ 254.215050] [] ? filemap_fault+0x187/0x2c4
[ 254.215050] [] sock_ioctl+0x1d4/0x1e0
[ 254.215050] [] ? sock_ioctl+0x0/0x1e0
[ 254.215050] [] vfs_ioctl+0x19/0x33
[ 254.215050] [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x424/0x46f
[ 254.215050] [] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x3c/0x40
[ 254.215050] [] sys_ioctl+0x40/0x5a
[ 254.215050] [] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22
Warning introduced with commit 690a1f2002a3091bd18a501f46c9530f10481463:
3c59x: Add ethtool WOL support
vortex_set_wol protected with a spinlock, but nested acpi_set_WOL acquires a mutex inside atomic context.
Do we really need to protect .set_wol with a vp->lock at all?
next reply other threads:[~2010-09-14 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-14 15:32 Denis Kirjanov [this message]
2010-09-14 15:52 ` suspend warning with 3c59x Andrew O. Shadoura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C8F9598.60309@kernel.org \
--to=dkirjanov@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@beldisplaytech.com \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).