From: "Krzysztof Olędzki" <ole@ans.pl>
To: Thomas Backlund <tmb@mandriva.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, "stable@kernel.org" <stable@kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [33-stable regression ssb/broadcom]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:02:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9099AF.6030303@ans.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C9097BA.1080208@mandriva.org>
On 2010-09-15 11:54, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> Greg KH skrev 14.9.2010 00:01:
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:41:23PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>>> Thomas Backlund skrev 13.9.2010 23:34:
>>>> John W. Linville skrev 13.9.2010 22:36:
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:23:29PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>>>>>> From: Thomas Backlund<tmb@mandriva.org>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:38:26 +0300
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In Mandriva 2010.1 we noticed that 2.6.33.7 broke ssb/Broadcom lan for
>>>>>>> several users...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Issue is tracked at:
>>>>>>> https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60968
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reverting the commit restores a working lan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The offending commit is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please always CC: netdev on networking reports, otherwise you are
>>>>>> very unlikely to get any experts looking into your issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> IIRC, there was a bad patch that got sent for the 2.6.33.y series.
>>>>> I thought it had been reverted or fixed already?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>>> It got added in 2.6.33.7
>>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.33.y.git;a=commit;h=6fb037c2ed8378c7ab0c1e00536ba6b2a866503e
>>>>
>>>
>>> After checking some more...
>>>
>>> I see the revert of the broken patch was done in 2.6.34.3 and a set
>>> of ssb patches replacing it...
>>>
>>> but it didn't happend for 2.6.33.y
>>
>> Yeah, I think I "dropped" support for .33 by then and I really didn't
>> care anymore.
>>
>
> Yep.
> final 2.6.33.7 was released 8 days before 2.6.34.3.
>
>> Note, I have gotten a few rumblings that I should bring .33 back to life
>> for some loving due to a few distros relying on it, but I need to find
>> the time in my schedule to do so...
>>
>
> Well,
> if you dont want to really bring it back to life, I'd suggest to simply
> released a 2.6.33.8 with only reverting the broken patch as it would
> "unbreak" the tree and call it a day :-)
>
> Otherwise...
> I now have merged the ssb fixes from 26.34.3:
> 19bfed793ee38ce027326a3c518ff6201f673a8d ssb: do not read SPROM if it
> does not exist
> 3ca696ca403b2715018bd5c693ab105c3a3ea888 ssb: Look for SPROM at
> different offset on higher rev CC
> a8515c84db1a9c9be19d8d873b059473474b6dab ssb: fix NULL ptr deref when
> pcihost_wrapper is used
> 8235ddc2cd7a3367b688e0ed52ab377eac6cfad4 ssb: Handle alternate SSPROM
> location
>
> into 2.6.33.7 after reverting the broken commit and have confirmation
> from users that it still works, so thats what I'll do for Mandriva 2010.1
If a new 2.6.33-stable kernel is going to be release there is one more
important bugfix worth to be backported:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=719f835853a92f6090258114a72ffe41f09155cd
This bug is present in 2.6.33, 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-15 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4C8E6192.2010003@mandriva.org>
2010-09-13 19:23 ` [33-stable regression ssb/broadcom] David Miller
2010-09-13 19:36 ` John W. Linville
2010-09-13 20:34 ` Thomas Backlund
2010-09-13 20:41 ` Thomas Backlund
2010-09-13 21:01 ` Greg KH
2010-09-15 9:54 ` Thomas Backlund
2010-09-15 10:02 ` Krzysztof Olędzki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C9099AF.6030303@ans.pl \
--to=ole@ans.pl \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tmb@mandriva.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).