netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: allow FEC driver to not have attached PHY
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:58:52 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CAEB31C.2030609@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286457071.2271.4.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>

Hi Ben,

On 07/10/10 23:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 13:50 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a board with a ColdFire SoC on it with the built-in FEC
>> ethernet module. On this hardware the FEC eth output is directly
>> attached to a RTL8305 4-port 10/100 switch. There is no conventional
>> PHY, the FEC output is direct into the uplink port of the switch
>> chip.
>>
>> This setup doesn't work after the FEC code was switch to using
>> phylib. The driver used to have code to bypass phy detection/setup
>> for this particular board. The phylib probe finds nothing, and of
>> course sets a no-link condition.
>>
>> So, what is the cleanest way to support this?
>>
>> The attached patch adds a config option to do this sort of generically
>> for the FEC driver. But I am wondering if there isn't a better way?
> [...]
>
> Perhaps there could be a null PHY driver which does no MDIO and always
> reports link-up at the expected speed and duplex.  We used something
> like that in the sfc driver for some PHY-less boards (though we use our
> own PHY abstraction, not phylib).

Looks like that is what the FIXED_PHY does.,

Thanks
Greg


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee                      PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close                             FAX:         +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia                WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-08  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-07  3:50 [RFC] net: allow FEC driver to not have attached PHY Greg Ungerer
2010-10-07 13:11 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-10-08  5:58   ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2010-10-07 13:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2010-10-08  5:57   ` Greg Ungerer
2010-10-07 13:28 ` Simon Farnsworth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CAEB31C.2030609@snapgear.com \
    --to=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).