From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: allow FEC driver to not have attached PHY
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:58:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CAEB31C.2030609@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286457071.2271.4.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Hi Ben,
On 07/10/10 23:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 13:50 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a board with a ColdFire SoC on it with the built-in FEC
>> ethernet module. On this hardware the FEC eth output is directly
>> attached to a RTL8305 4-port 10/100 switch. There is no conventional
>> PHY, the FEC output is direct into the uplink port of the switch
>> chip.
>>
>> This setup doesn't work after the FEC code was switch to using
>> phylib. The driver used to have code to bypass phy detection/setup
>> for this particular board. The phylib probe finds nothing, and of
>> course sets a no-link condition.
>>
>> So, what is the cleanest way to support this?
>>
>> The attached patch adds a config option to do this sort of generically
>> for the FEC driver. But I am wondering if there isn't a better way?
> [...]
>
> Perhaps there could be a null PHY driver which does no MDIO and always
> reports link-up at the expected speed and duplex. We used something
> like that in the sfc driver for some PHY-less boards (though we use our
> own PHY abstraction, not phylib).
Looks like that is what the FIXED_PHY does.,
Thanks
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-08 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 3:50 [RFC] net: allow FEC driver to not have attached PHY Greg Ungerer
2010-10-07 13:11 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-10-08 5:58 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2010-10-07 13:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2010-10-08 5:57 ` Greg Ungerer
2010-10-07 13:28 ` Simon Farnsworth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CAEB31C.2030609@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).