From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: allocate skbs on local node Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:36:46 +0300 Message-ID: <4CB5537E.30906@kernel.org> References: <1286838210.30423.128.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1286839363.30423.130.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1286859925.30423.184.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20101011230322.f0f6dd47.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1286866699.30423.234.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20101012002435.f51f2c0e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1286869793.2732.24.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20101012005856.994bea6d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4CB441CB.2000708@cs.helsinki.fi> <4CB54EE8.4020707@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoph Lameter , Andrew Morton , Eric Dumazet , David Miller , netdev , Michael Chan , Eilon Greenstein , Christoph Hellwig , LKML , Nick Piggin To: David Rientjes Return-path: Received: from freeflow.nu ([178.79.134.28]:40528 "EHLO freeflow.nu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751916Ab0JMGgt (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:36:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> I think Christoph is saying that we'd remove SLAB and make the unified >> allocator the new SLAB while keeping SLUB in place. On 10/13/10 9:31 AM, David Rientjes wrote: >> Right, so his unification patches would be against slab instead of slub >> which is a pretty major change from the current state of the patchset, >> although it might actually be smaller? No, the way I understood it was: rm mm/slab.c cp mm/slub.c mm/slab.c Pekka