From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG ? ipip unregister_netdevice_many()
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:16:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB62FAF.1030009@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101012.130520.48517464.davem@davemloft.net>
On 10/12/2010 10:05 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:32:40 -0700
>
>
>> It is just dealing with not flushing the entire routing cache, just the
>> routes that have expired. Which prevents one network namespace from
>> flushing it's routes and DOS'ing another.
>>
> That's a very indirect and obfuscated way of handling it.
>
I agree.
> And I still don't know why we let the first contiguous set of expired
> entries in the chain get freed outside of the lock, and the rest
> inside the lock. That really isn't explained by anything I've read.
>
> How about we just do exactly what's intended, and with no ifdefs?
>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
Dave,
do you mind to wait I test the patch before merging it ?
I would like to stress a bit this routine with multiple containers.
Thanks
-- Daniel
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller<davem@davemloft.net>
>
> diff --git a/include/net/route.h b/include/net/route.h
> index 7e5e73b..8d24761 100644
> --- a/include/net/route.h
> +++ b/include/net/route.h
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ extern int ip_rt_init(void);
> extern void ip_rt_redirect(__be32 old_gw, __be32 dst, __be32 new_gw,
> __be32 src, struct net_device *dev);
> extern void rt_cache_flush(struct net *net, int how);
> -extern void rt_cache_flush_batch(void);
> +extern void rt_cache_flush_batch(struct net *net);
> extern int __ip_route_output_key(struct net *, struct rtable **, const struct flowi *flp);
> extern int ip_route_output_key(struct net *, struct rtable **, struct flowi *flp);
> extern int ip_route_output_flow(struct net *, struct rtable **rp, struct flowi *flp, struct sock *sk, int flags);
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> index 919f2ad..4039f56 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> @@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static int fib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, vo
> rt_cache_flush(dev_net(dev), 0);
> break;
> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH:
> - rt_cache_flush_batch();
> + rt_cache_flush_batch(dev_net(dev));
> break;
> }
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> index 0755aa4..6ad730c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> @@ -712,13 +712,14 @@ static inline int rt_is_expired(struct rtable *rth)
> * Can be called by a softirq or a process.
> * In the later case, we want to be reschedule if necessary
> */
> -static void rt_do_flush(int process_context)
> +static void rt_do_flush(struct net *net, int process_context)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> struct rtable *rth, *next;
> - struct rtable * tail;
>
> for (i = 0; i<= rt_hash_mask; i++) {
> + struct rtable *list, **pprev;
> +
> if (process_context&& need_resched())
> cond_resched();
> rth = rt_hash_table[i].chain;
> @@ -726,41 +727,27 @@ static void rt_do_flush(int process_context)
> continue;
>
> spin_lock_bh(rt_hash_lock_addr(i));
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> - {
> - struct rtable ** prev, * p;
>
> - rth = rt_hash_table[i].chain;
> + pprev =&rt_hash_table[i].chain;
> + rth = *pprev;
> + while (rth) {
> + next = rth->dst.rt_next;
> + if (dev_net(rth->dst.dev) == net) {
> + *pprev = next;
>
> - /* defer releasing the head of the list after spin_unlock */
> - for (tail = rth; tail; tail = tail->dst.rt_next)
> - if (!rt_is_expired(tail))
> - break;
> - if (rth != tail)
> - rt_hash_table[i].chain = tail;
> -
> - /* call rt_free on entries after the tail requiring flush */
> - prev =&rt_hash_table[i].chain;
> - for (p = *prev; p; p = next) {
> - next = p->dst.rt_next;
> - if (!rt_is_expired(p)) {
> - prev =&p->dst.rt_next;
> - } else {
> - *prev = next;
> - rt_free(p);
> - }
> - }
> + rth->dst.rt_next = list;
> + list = rth;
> + } else
> + pprev =&rth->dst.rt_next;
> +
> + rth = next;
> }
> -#else
> - rth = rt_hash_table[i].chain;
> - rt_hash_table[i].chain = NULL;
> - tail = NULL;
> -#endif
> +
> spin_unlock_bh(rt_hash_lock_addr(i));
>
> - for (; rth != tail; rth = next) {
> - next = rth->dst.rt_next;
> - rt_free(rth);
> + for (; list; list = next) {
> + next = list->dst.rt_next;
> + rt_free(list);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -906,13 +893,13 @@ void rt_cache_flush(struct net *net, int delay)
> {
> rt_cache_invalidate(net);
> if (delay>= 0)
> - rt_do_flush(!in_softirq());
> + rt_do_flush(net, !in_softirq());
> }
>
> /* Flush previous cache invalidated entries from the cache */
> -void rt_cache_flush_batch(void)
> +void rt_cache_flush_batch(struct net *net)
> {
> - rt_do_flush(!in_softirq());
> + rt_do_flush(net, !in_softirq());
> }
>
> static void rt_emergency_hash_rebuild(struct net *net)
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-13 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 8:48 BUG ? ipip unregister_netdevice_many() Hans Schillstrom
2010-10-08 11:19 ` Daniel Lezcano
2010-10-08 11:53 ` Hans Schillstrom
2010-10-08 12:28 ` Hans Schillstrom
2010-10-08 15:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
2010-10-08 16:17 ` Daniel Lezcano
2010-10-08 16:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-08 17:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2010-10-08 17:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2010-10-08 16:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-08 17:20 ` David Miller
2010-10-08 17:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-12 20:05 ` David Miller
2010-10-13 11:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-10-13 21:58 ` David Miller
2010-10-14 6:41 ` Hans Schillstrom
2010-10-13 22:16 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2010-10-13 23:23 ` David Miller
2010-10-14 3:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-14 23:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-10-14 4:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-14 4:50 ` David Miller
2010-10-14 5:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-14 15:09 ` David Miller
2010-10-14 18:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-08 16:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-08 16:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-14 19:21 Octavian Purdila
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB62FAF.1030009@free.fr \
--to=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).