netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>,
	Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net:  allocate skbs on local node
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:22:35 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB6A1AB.4030800@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010131539440.27839@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>> I was going to mention that as an idea, but I thought storing the metadata
>>> for certain debugging features might differ from the two allocators so
>>> substantially that it would be even more convoluted and difficult to
>>> maintain?
>>
>> We could have some callbacks to store allocator specific metadata?

On 10/14/10 1:41 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> It depends on whether we could share the same base for both slab (unified
> allocator) and slub, which you snipped from your reply, that would make
> this cleaner.

Argh. Why would we want to introduce something that's effectively a new 
allocator based on SLUB? If there's something controversial in the 
current patch series, lets just keep it out of mainline. A "rewrite" is 
the reason we're in this mess so lets not repeat the same mistake again!

			Pekka

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-14  6:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-11 23:03 [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: dont use netdev_alloc_skb() Eric Dumazet
2010-10-11 23:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12  5:03   ` Tom Herbert
2010-10-12  5:16     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12  9:12       ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-10-14 17:39         ` David Miller
2010-10-14 18:17           ` Eilon Greenstein
2010-10-14 18:20             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-14 18:25               ` David Miller
2010-10-14 18:17           ` Tom Herbert
2010-10-12  5:05   ` [PATCH net-next] net: allocate skbs on local node Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12  5:35     ` Tom Herbert
2010-10-12  6:03     ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-12  6:58       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12  7:24         ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-12  7:49           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12  7:58             ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-12 11:08               ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-12 12:50                 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-12 19:43                   ` David Rientjes
2010-10-13  6:17                     ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-13  6:31                       ` David Rientjes
2010-10-13  6:36                         ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-13 16:00                     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-13 20:48                       ` David Rientjes
2010-10-13 21:43                         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-13 22:41                           ` David Rientjes
2010-10-14  6:22                             ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2010-10-14  7:23                               ` David Rientjes
2010-10-15 14:23                             ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-14 15:31       ` Tom Herbert
2010-10-14 16:05         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-15 16:57           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-14 19:27         ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-14 19:59           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-16 18:54     ` David Miller
2010-10-12 16:07 ` [BUG net-next] bnx2x: all traffic comes to RX queue 0 Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12 16:20   ` Dmitry Kravkov
2010-10-12 18:11     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12 18:18       ` Vladislav Zolotarov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CB6A1AB.4030800@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eilong@broadcom.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).