From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RFD: OF device tree vs. PHY flags.
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:18:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB89AD8.7020200@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
I am in the process of planning a conversion of Octeon SOC platform code
to use the OF device tree in the Linux kernel.
One issue that I have encountered, is that for some boards, we need to
pass a non-zero flags argument to the phy_attach_direct() method. The
value of the flags is board dependent, so it would make some sense to
encode its value in the device tree itself. The flags I am interested
in control the configuration of clocking modes and status LED connections.
I would suggest the following:
o Add a new property to "ethernet-phy" dts bindings called
"linux,flags". It would contain a comma separated string of flag names.
Something like "led-mode1,clock-mode2". The semantics of the flag
names would be interpreted by the PHY driver...
o Add a new function pointer to struct phy_driver: u32
(*of_parse_flags)(struct phy_device *phydev). This would parse and
return the flags value for the "linux,flags" property from the
device_node associated with the particular PHY device in question.
o Modify of_phy_connect() to do something like the following:
.
.
.
if (phy->driver && phy->driver->of_parse_flags)
flags |= phy->driver->of_parse_flags(phy);
.
.
.
o Perhaps add some helper functions to of_mdio.c to assist in parsing
the "linux,flags" properties string.
o Any extra code in the PHY drivers and struct phy_driver would be
protected by #ifdef CONFIG_OF
How does this sound?
Any suggestions as for improvements, or better names for things?
Thanks,
David Daney
next reply other threads:[~2010-10-15 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-15 18:18 David Daney [this message]
2010-10-16 3:39 ` RFD: OF device tree vs. PHY flags Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB89AD8.7020200@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).