From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: luca@llucax.com.ar, jon.maloy@ericsson.com,
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.35/TIPC 2.0 ABI breaking changes
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:11:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CBCD429.8090306@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101018.151708.193712688.davem@davemloft.net>
On 10-10-18 06:17 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:42:33 -0400
>
>> If you have access to the user space code in question, you can just
>> switch behaviour semantics based on the results of a uname call, knowing
>> that this change was included in versions since approx last Feb. There
>> is also /proc/version which can be parsed manually if you prefer.
>
> Requiring userspace to check kernel versioning information in order
> to user an exported userspace API correctly is _ALWAYS_ _WRONG_.
>
> You cannot and must not make backwards incompatible changes to
> userspace interfaces.
What I think has happened here (and I'll double check this
tomorrow, since it is before I started assisting with tipc)
is that a backwards incompatible change *did* inadvertently
creep in via these two (related) commits:
--------------
commit d88dca79d3852a3623f606f781e013d61486828a
Author: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Mon Mar 8 12:20:58 2010 -0800
tipc: fix endianness on tipc subscriber messages
--------------
and
---------------
commit c6537d6742985da1fbf12ae26cde6a096fd35b5c
Author: Jon Paul Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue Apr 6 11:40:52 2010 +0000
TIPC: Updated topology subscription protocol according to latest spec
---------------
Based on Leandro's info, I think it comes down to userspace
not knowing exactly where to find these bits anymore:
#define TIPC_SUB_SERVICE 0x00 /* Filter for service availability */
#define TIPC_SUB_PORTS 0x01 /* Filter for port availability */
#define TIPC_SUB_CANCEL 0x04 /* Cancel a subscription */
...because it doesn't know if there is the old auto endian
swap thing being done or not being done.
Assuming it is possible to do so in some non-kludgy way,
it sounds like we want to be looking into an in-kernel change
that ensures the older user space binaries get their
functionality restored then?
Thanks,
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-18 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100927163823.GD2834@integratech.com.ar>
[not found] ` <29C1DC0826876849BDD9F1C67ABA2943090B67EC@ala-mail09.corp.ad.wrs.com>
[not found] ` <20100929153805.GG2834@integratech.com.ar>
[not found] ` <29C1DC0826876849BDD9F1C67ABA29430914AC18@ala-mail09.corp.ad.wrs.com>
[not found] ` <20101001150034.GS8781@llucax.com.ar>
[not found] ` <0434463FDA60A94FA978ACA44617682DEE843EDD79@EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se>
[not found] ` <20101001162346.GV8781@llucax.com.ar>
[not found] ` <4CA69F18.7000005@amln.net>
[not found] ` <0434463FDA60A94FA978ACA44617682DEE8446A03B@EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se>
2010-10-18 15:04 ` Linux 2.6.35/TIPC 2.0 ABI breaking changes [was: TIPC 2.0 and TIPC_SUB_SERVICE] Leandro Lucarella
[not found] ` <20101018150422.GV8781@llucax.com.ar>
2010-10-18 18:46 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-18 20:42 ` Paul Gortmaker
2010-10-18 22:17 ` Linux 2.6.35/TIPC 2.0 ABI breaking changes David Miller
2010-10-18 23:11 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2010-10-18 23:38 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-18 23:45 ` Neil Horman
2010-10-19 2:16 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-19 8:16 ` David Miller
2010-10-19 11:04 ` Neil Horman
2010-10-19 11:06 ` David Miller
2010-10-19 13:19 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-19 13:28 ` Neil Horman
2010-10-19 20:18 ` Neil Horman
2010-10-19 20:43 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-19 22:03 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-20 17:20 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-20 17:57 ` Jon Maloy
2010-10-20 18:04 ` Neil Horman
2010-10-20 18:10 ` Jon Maloy
2010-10-20 18:28 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-20 19:23 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-20 22:59 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-20 18:24 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-20 18:37 ` Jon Maloy
2010-10-20 18:44 ` Leandro Lucarella
2010-10-20 17:57 ` Neil Horman
2010-10-18 23:58 ` Alan Cox
2010-10-20 1:09 nhorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CBCD429.8090306@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca@llucax.com.ar \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).