From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: OOM when adding ipv6 route: How to make available more per-cpu memory?
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:27:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD86B4D.6020406@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289214131.2820.187.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On 11/08/2010 03:02 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 10:08 -0700, Ben Greear a écrit :
>
>> At least I don't see any percpu dumps in dmesg. I vaguely remember
>> someone posting some ipv6 address scalability patches some time back.
>> I think they had to hack on /proc fs as well. I'll see if I can
>> dig those up.
>>
>>> Make sure udev / hotplug is not the problem, if you create your devices
>>> very fast.
>>
>> We can create the macvlans w/out problem, though I'm sure that could
>> be sped up. The problem is when we try to add IPv6 addresses to
>> them.
>
> I see. Did you check /proc/sys/net/ipv6/ tunables ?
>
> For example, I bet you need to make route/max_size a bigger value than
> default (4096)
I'm having a hard time figuring out how this actually causes something
to fail.
It seems that having max_size too small would cause the garbage collector
logic to happen more often, but I don't see any place it actually
removes or limits entries, and I can't find any other references to
ip6_rt_max_size.
I must just be missing something..so if you have any ideas where to
look, I'd love to hear it!
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-05 17:19 OOM when adding ipv6 route: How to make available more per-cpu memory? Ben Greear
2010-11-05 18:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 18:15 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-05 20:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 20:26 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-05 20:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 22:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-06 0:07 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-06 7:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-06 17:08 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-08 11:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-08 17:45 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-08 17:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-08 18:08 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-08 21:27 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2010-11-08 21:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-06 9:11 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD86B4D.6020406@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).