From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] macvlan: lockless tx path
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:46:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDB2EBC.2090905@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289432184.17691.141.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On 11/10/2010 03:36 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 10 novembre 2010 à 14:53 -0800, Ben Greear a écrit :
>
>> I did similar, and then wrote extra code to detect a 64-bit kernel and if
>> so assume that the counters wrap at 64 bits so I didn't have to poll so
>> often to make sure I didn't miss a wrap for a 10G NIC. If instead one wraps at 33
>> bits and the other at 36, there is no way for me to deal with the wrap
>> properly w/out explicitly knowing about that 33 and 36.
>>
>
> How do you define 'wrap around' ? Maybe your definition is wrong.
Maybe so. My algorithm looks like:
// uint64 accum;
// uint32 old;
// uint32 new;
if (old > new) {
// This assumes counters wrap at 32 bits (ie, 0xFFFFFFFF).
accum += ((uint32)(0xFFFFFFFF) - old) + new;
}
else if (old < new) {
accum += new - old;
}
old = new;
...
Is there some way I can do this w/out the (0xFFFFFFFF - old),
and thus the assumption of 32-bit counters?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-10 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-10 15:41 [PATCH] macvlan: lockless tx path Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 17:39 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-10 17:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 17:53 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-10 18:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 18:40 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-10 20:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 21:04 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-11-10 21:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 21:53 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-11-10 21:35 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-10 22:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 22:53 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-10 23:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 23:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-10 23:46 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2010-11-11 7:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-11 16:40 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-11 16:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-11 17:20 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-11 18:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-11 18:13 ` Ben Greear
2010-11-11 18:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-11 7:14 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-11-12 8:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-11-16 18:59 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDB2EBC.2090905@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).