From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Subject: Re: extended netdevice naming proposal
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:34:29 -0800
Message-ID: <4CE571B5.9070600@hp.com>
References: <20101117220659.GA12177@auslistsprd01.us.dell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	narendra_k@dell.com, jcm@redhat.com, notting@redhat.com
To: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
Return-path: <linux-hotplug-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101117220659.GA12177@auslistsprd01.us.dell.com>
Sender: linux-hotplug-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

With the presence of the pci_slot driver to allow association of the PCI address 
with a "slot name" is encoding such information into the interface name really 
necessary?

rick jones