From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shan Wei Subject: Re: Fwd: Simple kernel attack using socketpair. easy, 100% reproductiblle, works under guest. no way to protect :( Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:41:24 +0800 Message-ID: <4CEF64A4.5080802@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1290666501.2798.84.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1290668246.2798.93.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1290672978.2798.151.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1290694299.2858.330.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?UTF-8?B?0JzQsNGA0Log0JrQvtGA0LXQvdCx0LXRgNCz?= , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:63946 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752539Ab0KZHnI (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 02:43:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1290694299.2858.330.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eric Dumazet wrote, at 11/25/2010 10:11 PM: > @@ -1845,6 +1871,7 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, > unix_state_lock(sk); > skb = skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue); > if (skb == NULL) { > + unix_sk(sk)->recursion_level = 0; For SOCK_SEQPACKET type, no need to clear recursion_level counter? -- Best Regards ----- Shan Wei