From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Using net_devices with ATM/DSL
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:53:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D05C2D3.7010306@redfish-solutions.com> (raw)
I was trying to get this discussion rolling on linux-atm-general but didn't have much luck.
I was wondering what the downside to having ATM/DSL interfaces use net_devices would be?
Part of the reason for wanting to do this is to have an end-point to send/receive netlink messages to, so that the interface can report carrier state transitions, bit rates, bit-error rates, SNR, attenuation, constellations, transmitter gain, etc.
Seems simple enough.
Why not do this?
Thanks,
-Philip
next reply other threads:[~2010-12-13 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-13 6:53 Philip Prindeville [this message]
2010-12-13 12:50 ` Using net_devices with ATM/DSL Florian Fainelli
2010-12-15 4:36 ` Philip Prindeville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D05C2D3.7010306@redfish-solutions.com \
--to=philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).