From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Kleine-Budde Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3 1/1] can: c_can: Added support for Bosch C_CAN controller Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:44:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4D261BA4.2020003@pengutronix.de> References: <1294135195-9448-1-git-send-email-bhupesh.sharma@st.com> <20110106.113356.102556872.davem@davemloft.net> <4D261AAA.5030005@grandegger.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3107986359821671244==" Cc: Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, David Miller To: Wolfgang Grandegger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D261AAA.5030005-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============3107986359821671244== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDF0BBA439C9D3722317CCB08" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDF0BBA439C9D3722317CCB08 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Wolfgang, On 01/06/2011 08:40 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > On 01/06/2011 08:33 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Bhupesh Sharma >> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:29:55 +0530 >> >>> Bosch C_CAN controller is a full-CAN implementation which is complian= t >>> to CAN protocol version 2.0 part A and B. Bosch C_CAN user manual can= be >>> obtained from: >>> http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/pdf/Users_Manual_C_CAN.pdf >> >> Can someone please review this driver submission? >=20 > Yes, of course. I'm still on holiday, hope to find some time tomorrow. If this driver will be merged, we'll have two drivers for the same can core in the tree. The other one is the pch_can. What do you think should be the mid term perspective for ccan based hardware? regards, Marc --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | --------------enigDF0BBA439C9D3722317CCB08 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0mG6oACgkQjTAFq1RaXHPs+QCfUAxbHsKbwssUJJiYTWTNUHzI vwYAn1wqcmTIoZt92hD4+mU7IWuuDoBF =yP1i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDF0BBA439C9D3722317CCB08-- --===============3107986359821671244== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core --===============3107986359821671244==--