netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicolas de Pesloüan" <nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com>
To: "Oleg V. Ukhno" <olegu@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: "Jay Vosburgh" <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Sébastien Barré" <sebastien.barre@uclouvain.be>,
	"Christophe Paasch" <christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: added 802.3ad round-robin hashing policy for single TCP session balancing
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:12:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3745AF.5040808@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D370DC7.6000500@yandex-team.ru>

Le 19/01/2011 17:13, Oleg V. Ukhno a écrit :
> On 01/18/2011 11:24 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
[snip]
>> I haven't done much testing with this lately, but I suspect this
>> behavior hasn't really changed. Raising the tcp_reordering sysctl value
>> can mitigate this somewhat (by making TCP more tolerant of this), but
>> that doesn't help non-TCP protocols.
>>
>> Barring evidence to the contrary, I presume that Oleg's system
>> delivers out of order at the receiver. That's not automatically a
>> reason to reject it, but this entire proposal is sufficiently complex to
>> configure that very explicit documentation will be necessary.
>>
>> -J
>>
>> ---
>> -Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
>>
>
> Jay,
[snip]
>
> What is your opinion on my idea with patch?
>
> I will come back with results for VLAN tunneling case, if this is
> necessary (Nicolas, shall I do that test - I think it will show similar
> results for performance?)

If you have time for that, then yes, please, do the same test using balance-rr+vlan to segregate 
path. With those results, we whould have the opportunity to enhance the documentation with some well 
tested cases of TCP load balancing on a LAN, not limited to 802.3ad automatic setup. Both setups 
make sense, and assuming the results would be similar is probably true, but not reliable enough to 
assert it into the documentation.

Thanks,

	Nicolas.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-19 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-14 19:07 [PATCH] bonding: added 802.3ad round-robin hashing policy for single TCP session balancing Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-14 20:10 ` John Fastabend
2011-01-14 23:12   ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-14 20:13 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-14 22:51   ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-15  0:05     ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-15 12:11       ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18  3:16       ` John Fastabend
2011-01-18 12:40         ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 14:54           ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-18 15:28             ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 16:24               ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-18 16:57                 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 20:24                 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-18 21:20                   ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-19  1:45                     ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-18 22:22                   ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-19 16:13                   ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-19 20:12                     ` Nicolas de Pesloüan [this message]
2011-01-21 13:55                       ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-22 12:48                         ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-24 19:32                           ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-29  2:28                         ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-01 16:25                           ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-02-02 17:30                             ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-02  9:54                           ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-02 17:57                             ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-03 14:54                               ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 17:56               ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-01-18 16:41           ` John Fastabend
2011-01-18 17:21             ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-14 20:41 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D3745AF.5040808@gmail.com \
    --to=nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com \
    --cc=christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olegu@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=sebastien.barre@uclouvain.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).