From: "Nicolas de Pesloüan" <nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com>
To: "Oleg V. Ukhno" <olegu@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: added 802.3ad round-robin hashing policy for single TCP session balancing
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:48:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3AD234.7080709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D399062.3060004@yandex-team.ru>
Le 21/01/2011 14:55, Oleg V. Ukhno a écrit :
> On 01/19/2011 11:12 PM, Nicolas de Pesloüan wrote:
>
>> If you have time for that, then yes, please, do the same test using
>> balance-rr+vlan to segregate path. With those results, we whould have
>> the opportunity to enhance the documentation with some well tested cases
>> of TCP load balancing on a LAN, not limited to 802.3ad automatic setup.
>> Both setups make sense, and assuming the results would be similar is
>> probably true, but not reliable enough to assert it into the
>> documentation.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nicolas.
>>
> Nicolas,
> I've ran similar tests for VLAN tunneling scenario. Results are
> identical, as I expected. The only significat difference is link failure
> handling. 802.3ad mode allows almost painless load reditribution,
> balance-rr causes packet loss.
Oleg,
Thanks for doing the tests.
What link failure mode did you use for those tests ? miimon or arp monitoring ?
Nicolas.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-22 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-14 19:07 [PATCH] bonding: added 802.3ad round-robin hashing policy for single TCP session balancing Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-14 20:10 ` John Fastabend
2011-01-14 23:12 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-14 20:13 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-14 22:51 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-15 0:05 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-15 12:11 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 3:16 ` John Fastabend
2011-01-18 12:40 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 14:54 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-18 15:28 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 16:24 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-18 16:57 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 20:24 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-18 21:20 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-19 1:45 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-01-18 22:22 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-19 16:13 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-19 20:12 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-01-21 13:55 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-22 12:48 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan [this message]
2011-01-24 19:32 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-29 2:28 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-01 16:25 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-02-02 17:30 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-02 9:54 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-02 17:57 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-03 14:54 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-18 17:56 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-01-18 16:41 ` John Fastabend
2011-01-18 17:21 ` Oleg V. Ukhno
2011-01-14 20:41 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D3AD234.7080709@gmail.com \
--to=nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olegu@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).