From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 configurable default value for the privacy extension flag Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:04:37 +0900 Message-ID: <4D478655.6040706@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20110131164945.3370cbcd@baileys.at.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: =?UTF-8?B?SnVsaWVuIEF1YsOp?= , netdev@vger.kernel.org, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki To: j.aube@laposte.net Return-path: Received: from 94.43.138.210.xn.2iij.net ([210.138.43.94]:36874 "EHLO mail.st-paulia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751789Ab1BAEO5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:14:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110131164945.3370cbcd@baileys.at.home> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello. (2011/02/01 0:49), Julien Aub=C3=A9 wrote: >+ } else { >+ printk(KERN_WARNING "IPv6 Privacy Extension " >+ "is disabled by default (invalid value %d)\n", ipv6_default_privacy)= ; >+ } I think WARNING is too high. --yoshfuji