From: "Nicolas de Pesloüan" <nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
kaber@trash.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, andy@greyhouse.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 V3] net: convert bonding to use rx_handler
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:56:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5FA1D7.4050801@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110219080523.GB2782@psychotron.redhat.com>
Le 19/02/2011 09:05, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> This patch converts bonding to use rx_handler. Results in cleaner
> __netif_receive_skb() with much less exceptions needed. Also
> bond-specific work is moved into bond code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko<jpirko@redhat.com>
>
> v1->v2:
> using skb_iif instead of new input_dev to remember original
> device
> v2->v3:
> set orig_dev = skb->dev if skb_iif is set
>
Why do we need to let the rx_handlers call netif_rx() or __netif_receive_skb()?
Bonding used to be handled with very few overhead, simply replacing skb->dev with skb->dev->master.
Time has passed and we eventually added many special processing for bonding into
__netif_receive_skb(), but the overhead remained very light.
Calling netif_rx() (or __netif_receive_skb()) to allow nesting would probably lead to some overhead.
Can't we, instead, loop inside __netif_receive_skb(), and deliver whatever need to be delivered, to
whoever need, inside the loop ?
rx_handler = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler);
while (rx_handler) {
/* ... */
orig_dev = skb->dev;
skb = rx_handler(skb);
/* ... */
rx_handler = (skb->dev != orig_dev) ? rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler) : NULL;
}
This would reduce the overhead, while still allowing nesting: vlan on top on bonding, bridge on top
on bonding, ...
That way, we can probably keep the list of crossed devices inside a local array, and call
deliver_skb() with the current "orig_dev" when appropriate. No need to overload sk_buff nor to use a
global variable.
Of course, this might be a very simplistic view.
Any comments?
Nicolas.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-19 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-18 13:25 [patch net-next-2.6] net: convert bonding to use rx_handler Jiri Pirko
2011-02-18 13:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-18 14:14 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-18 14:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-18 14:46 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-18 14:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-18 15:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-02-18 16:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-18 18:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-18 19:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-18 19:28 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-18 19:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-18 20:03 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-18 20:06 ` David Miller
2011-02-18 20:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-18 20:58 ` [patch net-next-2.6 V2] " Jiri Pirko
2011-02-18 23:06 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-19 7:44 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-19 8:05 ` [patch net-next-2.6 V3] " Jiri Pirko
2011-02-19 8:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-19 8:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-19 9:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-19 10:56 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan [this message]
2011-02-19 11:08 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-19 11:28 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-19 13:18 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-19 13:46 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-19 14:32 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-19 20:27 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-20 10:36 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-20 12:12 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-20 15:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-21 23:20 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-26 14:24 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-26 19:42 ` Jay Vosburgh
2011-02-27 12:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-27 20:44 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-27 23:22 ` David Miller
2011-02-28 7:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-28 7:30 ` David Miller
2011-02-28 9:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-28 9:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-28 9:55 ` [patch net-next-2.6] net: convert bonding to use rx_handler - second part Jiri Pirko
2011-02-28 18:49 ` [patch net-next-2.6 V3] net: convert bonding to use rx_handler David Miller
2011-02-23 19:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-25 23:46 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-26 7:14 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-26 11:25 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-26 14:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-27 14:17 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-27 20:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-27 20:59 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D5FA1D7.4050801@gmail.com \
--to=nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).