From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Henry Nestler Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] DM9000B: Fix PHY power for network down/up Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:58:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4D64155C.9050407@henry.nestler.mail.gmail.com> References: <4D618B5D.5040001@henry.nestler.mail.gmail.com> <4D62491F.4050602@ru.mvista.com> <4D62D323.7010403@henry.nestler.mail.gmail.com> <20110222.102410.260079835.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sshtylyov@mvista.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sergei Shtylyov To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:59469 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751890Ab1BVT6s (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:58:48 -0500 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so3127790fxm.19 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:58:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110222.102410.260079835.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello David, On 22.02.2011 19:24, David Miller wrote: > From: Henry Nestler > Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:03:31 +0100 > >> On 21.02.2011 12:14, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >>> On 21-02-2011 0:45, Henry Nestler wrote: >>>> + udelay(1000); /* delay needs by DM9000B */ >>> >>> Why not mdelay(1)? >> >> Because udelay is the base of mdelay. >> See include/linux/delay.h:31 >> >> #define mdelay(n) ... udelay((n)*1000) > > He is telling you to use mdelay(1) because it's clearer. Please do > so. Thanks, that text explains it better. No problem. I will resend this patch. -- Henry N.