From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: [PATCH] iproute2: allow to specify truncation bits on auth algo Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:46:12 +0100 Message-ID: <4D6BA724.2020504@6wind.com> References: <20110128045108.GA8351@gondor.apana.org.au> <4D42839C.3050401@6wind.com> <20110128.114610.193716130.davem@davemloft.net> <4D498693.6020909@6wind.com> <4D49879B.4060108@6wind.com> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, christophe.gouault@6wind.com To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:56545 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754170Ab1B1NqR (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:46:17 -0500 Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so3647969bwz.19 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 05:46:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D49879B.4060108@6wind.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, what is the status of this patch? It has been set to 'Superseded' in the patchwork tool (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/81486/). Kernel headers have been updated in iproute2, should I resend the patch? Regards, Nicolas On 02/02/2011 17:34, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > On 02/02/2011 17:30, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: >> On 28/01/2011 20:46, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Nicolas Dichtel >>> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:51:40 +0100 >>> >>>> On 28/01/2011 05:51, Herbert Xu wrote: >>>>> So perhaps an SA configuration flag is needed? >>>> I agree. If David is ok, I will update the patch. >>> >>> Sounds good to me. >> And the patch for iproute2. > Sorry, two patches were mixed :( > > Here is the right one. > > > Regards, > Nicolas