netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicolas de Pesloüan" <nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	shemminger@linux-foundation.org, kaber@trash.net,
	fubar@us.ibm.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 2/8] bonding: register slave pointer for rx_handler
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:06:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D724382.7010705@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299320969-7951-3-git-send-email-jpirko@redhat.com>

Le 05/03/2011 11:29, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> Register slave pointer as rx_handler data. That would eventually prevent
> need to loop over slave devices to find the right slave.
>
> Use synchronize_net to ensure that bond_handle_frame does not get slave
> structure freed when working with that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko<jpirko@redhat.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |   17 +++++++++++------
>   drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h   |    3 +++
>   2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 0592e6d..1c19368 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -1495,21 +1495,22 @@ static bool bond_should_deliver_exact_match(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
>   static struct sk_buff *bond_handle_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
>   {
> -	struct net_device *slave_dev;
> +	struct slave *slave;
>   	struct net_device *bond_dev;
>
>   	skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>   	if (unlikely(!skb))
>   		return NULL;
> -	slave_dev = skb->dev;
> -	bond_dev = ACCESS_ONCE(slave_dev->master);
> +
> +	slave = bond_slave_get_rcu(skb->dev);
> +	bond_dev = ACCESS_ONCE(slave->dev->master);
>   	if (unlikely(!bond_dev))
>   		return skb;
>
>   	if (bond_dev->priv_flags&  IFF_MASTER_ARPMON)
> -		slave_dev->last_rx = jiffies;
> +		slave->dev->last_rx = jiffies;
>
> -	if (bond_should_deliver_exact_match(skb, slave_dev, bond_dev)) {
> +	if (bond_should_deliver_exact_match(skb, slave->dev, bond_dev)) {
>   		skb->deliver_no_wcard = 1;
>   		return skb;
>   	}

Up to this point, it looks like cleanup, and unrelated to the title and description of the patch.

Anyway, the cleanup looks good to me. Should just be in a separate patch.

> @@ -1703,7 +1704,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
>   		pr_debug("Error %d calling netdev_set_bond_master\n", res);
>   		goto err_restore_mac;
>   	}
> -	res = netdev_rx_handler_register(slave_dev, bond_handle_frame, NULL);
> +	res = netdev_rx_handler_register(slave_dev, bond_handle_frame,
> +					 new_slave);

And using rx_handler data for this purpose sounds good to me.

Reviewed-by: Nicolas de Pesloüan <nicolas.2p.debian@free.fr>

>   	if (res) {
>   		pr_debug("Error %d calling netdev_rx_handler_register\n", res);
>   		goto err_unset_master;
> @@ -1925,6 +1927,7 @@ err_close:
>
>   err_unreg_rxhandler:
>   	netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
> +	synchronize_net();
>
>   err_unset_master:
>   	netdev_set_bond_master(slave_dev, NULL);
> @@ -2108,6 +2111,7 @@ int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
>   	}
>
>   	netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
> +	synchronize_net();
>   	netdev_set_bond_master(slave_dev, NULL);
>
>   	slave_disable_netpoll(slave);
> @@ -2222,6 +2226,7 @@ static int bond_release_all(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>   		}
>
>   		netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
> +		synchronize_net();
>   		netdev_set_bond_master(slave_dev, NULL);
>
>   		slave_disable_netpoll(slave);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> index ff4e269..1aac5cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> @@ -264,6 +264,9 @@ struct bonding {
>   #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
>   };
>
> +#define bond_slave_get_rcu(dev) \
> +	((struct slave *) rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data))
> +
>   /**
>    * Returns NULL if the net_device does not belong to any of the bond's slaves
>    *


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-05 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-05 10:29 [patch net-next-2.6 0/8] mostly bonding rx path changes Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 1/8] af_packet: use skb->skb_iif instead of orig_dev->ifindex Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:03   ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 2/8] bonding: register slave pointer for rx_handler Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:06   ` Nicolas de Pesloüan [this message]
2011-03-05 14:27     ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:38       ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 3/8] net: get rid of multiple bond-related netdevice->priv_flags Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:14   ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 14:37     ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-05 14:46       ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 4/8] bonding: wrap slave state work Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:21   ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-07  9:58     ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-07 19:55       ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-08  7:18         ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-08 21:23           ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 5/8] bonding: get rid of IFF_SLAVE_INACTIVE netdev->priv_flag Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:18   ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 6/8] bonding: move processing of recv handlers into handle_frame() Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:33   ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 14:43     ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:50       ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-06 12:24         ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-06 13:34           ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-06 14:25             ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-06 16:32               ` Michał Mirosław
2011-03-06 17:37                 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-07 12:51             ` [patch net-next-2.6] net: reinject arps into bonding slave instead of master Jiri Pirko
2011-03-07 14:32               ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-03-07 20:12                 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-07 21:19                   ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-07 21:30                     ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-07 22:43               ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-03-07 23:09                 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-08  2:43                   ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-03-08 21:34                     ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-08  7:13                 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-08 13:42                   ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-03-08 21:44                     ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-09  7:45                       ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-09 14:49                         ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-09 15:09                           ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-09 15:28                             ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-09 17:11                               ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-09 22:18                                 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-10  6:48                                   ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-10 20:44                                     ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-10 20:52                                       ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-10 21:05                                       ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-09 20:51                         ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-09 13:33                       ` Neil Horman
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 7/8] net: introduce rx_handler results and logic around that Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 12:48   ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-05 14:52     ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 14:54       ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:06         ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 15:13     ` [patch net-next-2.6] net: comment rx_handler results Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:27       ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 15:37         ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:50           ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-06 20:00             ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: enhance the documentation for rx_handler Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-07  9:54               ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-07 16:36               ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-07 20:01                 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 V2] " Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 15:31   ` [patch net-next-2.6 7/8 v2] net: introduce rx_handler results and logic around that Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 8/8] net: get rid of orig_dev parameter of packet handlers Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:05   ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 15:15     ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:32   ` [patch net-next-2.6 8/8 v2] " Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 16:56     ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 22:07       ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 22:18         ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-05  8:29 [patch net-next-2.6 0/8] mostly bonding rx path changes Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05  8:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 2/8] bonding: register slave pointer for rx_handler Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D724382.7010705@gmail.com \
    --to=nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).