From: "Nicolas de Pesloüan" <nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, kaber@trash.net,
fubar@us.ibm.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 2/8] bonding: register slave pointer for rx_handler
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:38:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D724AE8.6050107@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110305142732.GB8573@psychotron.redhat.com>
Le 05/03/2011 15:27, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:06:58PM CET, nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com wrote:
>> Le 05/03/2011 11:29, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
>>> Register slave pointer as rx_handler data. That would eventually prevent
>>> need to loop over slave devices to find the right slave.
>>>
>>> Use synchronize_net to ensure that bond_handle_frame does not get slave
>>> structure freed when working with that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko<jpirko@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>>> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 3 +++
>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> index 0592e6d..1c19368 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> @@ -1495,21 +1495,22 @@ static bool bond_should_deliver_exact_match(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>
>>> static struct sk_buff *bond_handle_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> {
>>> - struct net_device *slave_dev;
>>> + struct slave *slave;
>>> struct net_device *bond_dev;
>>>
>>> skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>> if (unlikely(!skb))
>>> return NULL;
>>> - slave_dev = skb->dev;
>>> - bond_dev = ACCESS_ONCE(slave_dev->master);
>>> +
>>> + slave = bond_slave_get_rcu(skb->dev);
>>> + bond_dev = ACCESS_ONCE(slave->dev->master);
>>> if (unlikely(!bond_dev))
>>> return skb;
>>>
>>> if (bond_dev->priv_flags& IFF_MASTER_ARPMON)
>>> - slave_dev->last_rx = jiffies;
>>> + slave->dev->last_rx = jiffies;
>>>
>>> - if (bond_should_deliver_exact_match(skb, slave_dev, bond_dev)) {
>>> + if (bond_should_deliver_exact_match(skb, slave->dev, bond_dev)) {
>>> skb->deliver_no_wcard = 1;
>>> return skb;
>>> }
>>
>> Up to this point, it looks like cleanup, and unrelated to the title and description of the patch.
>
> Nope - these are changes connected to the ability to get slave struct
> via bond_slave_get_rcu. Very related.
Agreed.
>>
>> Anyway, the cleanup looks good to me. Should just be in a separate patch.
>>
>>> @@ -1703,7 +1704,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
>>> pr_debug("Error %d calling netdev_set_bond_master\n", res);
>>> goto err_restore_mac;
>>> }
>>> - res = netdev_rx_handler_register(slave_dev, bond_handle_frame, NULL);
>>> + res = netdev_rx_handler_register(slave_dev, bond_handle_frame,
>>> + new_slave);
>>
>> And using rx_handler data for this purpose sounds good to me.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Nicolas de Pesloüan<nicolas.2p.debian@free.fr>
>>
>>> if (res) {
>>> pr_debug("Error %d calling netdev_rx_handler_register\n", res);
>>> goto err_unset_master;
>>> @@ -1925,6 +1927,7 @@ err_close:
>>>
>>> err_unreg_rxhandler:
>>> netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
>>> + synchronize_net();
>>>
>>> err_unset_master:
>>> netdev_set_bond_master(slave_dev, NULL);
>>> @@ -2108,6 +2111,7 @@ int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
>>> }
>>>
>>> netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
>>> + synchronize_net();
>>> netdev_set_bond_master(slave_dev, NULL);
>>>
>>> slave_disable_netpoll(slave);
>>> @@ -2222,6 +2226,7 @@ static int bond_release_all(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>>> }
>>>
>>> netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
>>> + synchronize_net();
>>> netdev_set_bond_master(slave_dev, NULL);
>>>
>>> slave_disable_netpoll(slave);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>>> index ff4e269..1aac5cd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>>> @@ -264,6 +264,9 @@ struct bonding {
>>> #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
>>> };
>>>
>>> +#define bond_slave_get_rcu(dev) \
>>> + ((struct slave *) rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data))
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * Returns NULL if the net_device does not belong to any of the bond's slaves
>>> *
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-05 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-05 10:29 [patch net-next-2.6 0/8] mostly bonding rx path changes Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 1/8] af_packet: use skb->skb_iif instead of orig_dev->ifindex Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:03 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 2/8] bonding: register slave pointer for rx_handler Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:06 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 14:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:38 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan [this message]
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 3/8] net: get rid of multiple bond-related netdevice->priv_flags Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:14 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 14:37 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-05 14:46 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 4/8] bonding: wrap slave state work Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:21 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-07 9:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-07 19:55 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-08 7:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-08 21:23 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 5/8] bonding: get rid of IFF_SLAVE_INACTIVE netdev->priv_flag Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:18 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 6/8] bonding: move processing of recv handlers into handle_frame() Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:33 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 14:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 14:50 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-06 12:24 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-06 13:34 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-06 14:25 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-06 16:32 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-03-06 17:37 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-07 12:51 ` [patch net-next-2.6] net: reinject arps into bonding slave instead of master Jiri Pirko
2011-03-07 14:32 ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-03-07 20:12 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-07 21:19 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-07 21:30 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-07 22:43 ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-03-07 23:09 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-08 2:43 ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-03-08 21:34 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-08 7:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-08 13:42 ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-03-08 21:44 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-09 7:45 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-09 14:49 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-09 15:09 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-09 15:28 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-09 17:11 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-09 22:18 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-10 6:48 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-10 20:44 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-10 20:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-10 21:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-09 20:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-09 13:33 ` Neil Horman
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 7/8] net: introduce rx_handler results and logic around that Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 12:48 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-05 14:52 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 14:54 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:06 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 15:13 ` [patch net-next-2.6] net: comment rx_handler results Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:27 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 15:37 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:50 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-06 20:00 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: enhance the documentation for rx_handler Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-07 9:54 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-07 16:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-07 20:01 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 V2] " Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 15:31 ` [patch net-next-2.6 7/8 v2] net: introduce rx_handler results and logic around that Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 10:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 8/8] net: get rid of orig_dev parameter of packet handlers Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:05 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 15:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 15:32 ` [patch net-next-2.6 8/8 v2] " Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 16:56 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-03-05 22:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 22:18 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-05 8:29 [patch net-next-2.6 0/8] mostly bonding rx path changes Jiri Pirko
2011-03-05 8:29 ` [patch net-next-2.6 2/8] bonding: register slave pointer for rx_handler Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D724AE8.6050107@gmail.com \
--to=nicolas.2p.debian@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).