From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Weiping Pan Subject: Re: bonding can't change to another slave if you ifdown the active slave Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:38:48 +0800 Message-ID: <4D76F648.6040101@gmail.com> References: <4D75D244.9070409@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: WANG Cong Return-path: Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:36377 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932117Ab1CIDm7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:42:59 -0500 Received: by vxi39 with SMTP id 39so137821vxi.19 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:42:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/08/2011 08:51 PM, WANG Cong wrote: > On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:52:52 +0800, Weiping Pan wrote: > >> ok, I use "Host-only mode" and get >> >> >> >> an conclusion, that if the first enslaved nic is pulled out, bonding >> can't handle well. >> >> First test. >> I first enslave eth6, then pull it out, bonding doesn't work. on host, > ... >> >> Second test >> I first enslave eth6, then pull eth7 out, bonding works well. on guest, > Can you show me your /proc/net/bonding/bond0 before and after pulling down > eth6 or eth7? And what does `ip link show` say? > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html And I test it again, there is no problem with kvm. Maybe there is bug in virtualbox. thanks Weiping Pan