From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Santwona Behera <santwona.behera@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] ethtool: Compat handling for struct ethtool_rxnfc
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:01:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D83BA36.8020301@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300383272.2569.13.camel@bwh-desktop>
On 3/17/2011 10:34 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This structure was accidentally defined such that its layout can
> differ between 32-bit and 64-bit processes. Add compat structure
> definitions and an ioctl wrapper function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings<bhutchings@solarflare.com>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org [2.6.30+]
> ---
> David,
>
> I still haven't received any response on whether the ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLALL
> wrapping works with a real driver, but perhaps you could test it against
> niu? I think sparc32 and sparc64 have the same alignment for u64 so
> this wrapper isn't strictly necessary, but it would still be used. (Or
> we can arrange to disable the conversion when compat_ethtool_rxnfc is
> equivalent to ethtool_rxnfc.)
>
> Ben.
I've done a bit of testing this morning and verified GRXRINGS,
GRCLSRLCNT, GRXCLSRULE, SRXCLSRLDEL, and SRXCLSRLINS all seem to be
working for 32bit and 64bit ethtool user space on a x86_64 kernel with
the patch. I also verified the original issue was present by running
32bit ethtool on a x86_64 kernel without the patch applied.
In order to support flow extensions there will end up being a couple of
minor changes needed to the patch but I will just make sure to add them
when flow extensions are added.
Thanks,
Alex
Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-18 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-17 17:34 [PATCH net-2.6] ethtool: Compat handling for struct ethtool_rxnfc Ben Hutchings
2011-03-17 19:50 ` Alexander Duyck
2011-03-18 20:01 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2011-03-18 22:17 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D83BA36.8020301@intel.com \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santwona.behera@sun.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).