netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Santwona Behera <santwona.behera@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] ethtool: Compat handling for struct ethtool_rxnfc
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:01:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D83BA36.8020301@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300383272.2569.13.camel@bwh-desktop>

On 3/17/2011 10:34 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This structure was accidentally defined such that its layout can
> differ between 32-bit and 64-bit processes.  Add compat structure
> definitions and an ioctl wrapper function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings<bhutchings@solarflare.com>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org [2.6.30+]
> ---
> David,
>
> I still haven't received any response on whether the ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLALL
> wrapping works with a real driver, but perhaps you could test it against
> niu?  I think sparc32 and sparc64 have the same alignment for u64 so
> this wrapper isn't strictly necessary, but it would still be used.  (Or
> we can arrange to disable the conversion when compat_ethtool_rxnfc is
> equivalent to ethtool_rxnfc.)
>
> Ben.

I've done a bit of testing this morning and verified GRXRINGS, 
GRCLSRLCNT, GRXCLSRULE, SRXCLSRLDEL, and SRXCLSRLINS all seem to be 
working for 32bit and 64bit ethtool user space on a x86_64 kernel with 
the patch.  I also verified the original issue was present by running 
32bit ethtool on a x86_64 kernel without the patch applied.

In order to support flow extensions there will end up being a couple of 
minor changes needed to the patch but I will just make sure to add them 
when flow extensions are added.

Thanks,

Alex

Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-18 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-17 17:34 [PATCH net-2.6] ethtool: Compat handling for struct ethtool_rxnfc Ben Hutchings
2011-03-17 19:50 ` Alexander Duyck
2011-03-18 20:01 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2011-03-18 22:17   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D83BA36.8020301@intel.com \
    --to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=santwona.behera@sun.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).