From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Wei Gu <wei.gu@ericsson.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Low performance Intel 10GE NIC (3.2.10) on 2.6.38 Kernel
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:20:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9DE465.1080008@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302192218.3357.47.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On 4/7/2011 9:03 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 08:58 -0700, Alexander Duyck a écrit :
>> On 4/7/2011 4:46 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 19:15 +0800, Wei Gu a écrit :
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I compile the ixgbe driver into the kernel and run the test again and also change the copy to clone in the fw hook
>>>> This is the perf report while I was forwarding 150Kpps with
>>>> The attached file include the basic info about my test system. Please let me know if I did some thing wrong.
>>>>
>>>> + 71.91% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] poll_idle
>>>> + 10.43% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle
>>>> - 8.00% ksoftirqd/24 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
>>>> \u2592 - _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
>>>> \u2592 - 42.25% alloc_iova
>>>> \u2592 intel_alloc_iova
>>>> \u2592 __intel_map_single
>>>> \u2592 intel_map_page
>>
>> I'm almost certain this is the issue here. I am pretty sure the
>> intel_map_page call indicates that you are running with the Intel IOMMU
>> enabled. As Eric suggested you can either rebuild your kernel with
>> "CONFIG_DMAR=N", or pass the kernel the parameter "intel_iommu=off" in
>> order to disable it so that it will instead just use SWIOTLB.
>
> What's the purpose of intel_iommu ?
>
> Could this be speedup if ixgbe uses a perqueue iommu context instead of
> a per device, so that we dont hit a single spinlock ?
The intel_iommu is meant to be a security feature. Primarily it is used
in virtualzation where it allows KVM or Xen to direct assign a device
without having to worry about the guest getting access to the hosts
physical memory by submitting invalid DMA requests.
If virtualzation isn't in use I would recommend turning it off as it can
have a negative impact especially on small packet performance due to the
extra locking overhead that is required for DMA map and unmap calls.
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <D12839161ADD3A4B8DA63D1A134D084026E48B9BEB@ESGSCCMS0001.eapac.ericsson.se>
2011-04-07 4:58 ` Question on "net: allocate skbs on local node" Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 5:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 6:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 7:22 ` Low performance Intel 10GE NIC (3.2.10) on 2.6.38 Kernel Wei Gu
2011-04-07 8:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 8:39 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-07 9:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 11:15 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-07 11:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 13:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 15:58 ` Alexander Duyck
2011-04-07 16:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 16:20 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2011-04-07 16:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-08 8:59 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-08 9:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-08 9:15 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-08 9:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-08 9:59 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-08 9:41 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-08 12:19 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-08 12:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-08 14:10 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-08 14:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-09 3:51 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-08 15:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-09 3:27 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-09 6:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-10 7:02 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-11 14:50 ` Alexander Duyck
2011-04-11 15:00 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-11 15:14 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-11 15:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 1:22 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-12 4:40 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-12 4:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 5:18 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-14 5:42 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-14 6:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 6:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 6:58 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-14 16:42 ` Alexander Duyck
2011-04-14 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 16:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 17:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 19:08 ` Alexander Duyck
2011-04-15 2:10 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-15 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-15 9:14 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-18 21:12 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2011-04-19 4:09 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-21 2:57 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-21 3:25 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-08 16:22 ` Alexander Duyck
2011-04-09 3:36 ` Wei Gu
2011-04-09 4:40 ` Alexander H Duyck
2011-04-09 6:12 ` Wei Gu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D9DE465.1080008@intel.com \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.gu@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).