From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, casteyde.christian@free.fr,
Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 33502] New: Caught 64-bit read from uninitialized memory in __alloc_skb
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:56:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DAE7579.3020400@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303244270.2756.3.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On 4/19/11 11:17 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 19 avril 2011 à 12:10 -0500, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
>> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_CMPXCHG_LOCAL
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_CMPXCHG_LOCAL)&& \
>>> + !defined(CONFIG_KMEMCHECK)&& !defined(DEBUG_PAGEALLOC)
>>> +#define SLUB_USE_CMPXCHG_DOUBLE
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef SLUB_USE_CMPXCHG_DOUBLE
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
>>> /*
>> Ugg.. Isnt there some way to indicate to kmemcheck that a speculative
>> access is occurring?
> Yes, here is a totally untested patch (only compiled here), to keep
> kmemcheck& cmpxchg_double together.
Looks good to me! Can we get someone to test it as well?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-20 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-33502-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2011-04-18 22:38 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 33502] New: Caught 64-bit read from uninitialized memory in __alloc_skb Andrew Morton
2011-04-19 2:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-19 3:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-19 3:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-19 17:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-19 20:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-19 21:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-20 5:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-20 14:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-20 5:56 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2011-04-20 6:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-20 7:45 ` casteyde.christian
2011-04-20 7:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-20 8:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-20 8:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-20 9:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-20 10:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-20 14:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-20 14:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-20 14:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-20 15:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-20 15:15 ` Vegard Nossum
2011-04-20 15:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-20 15:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-20 15:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-20 19:36 ` Christian Casteyde
2011-04-20 19:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-20 20:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-05 6:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-05 6:22 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-05 6:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-05 18:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-05 18:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-05 19:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-09 19:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-09 20:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-09 20:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-10 8:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 9:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-10 10:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 10:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-10 10:03 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-10 10:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 10:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-10 11:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 12:24 ` Vegard Nossum
2011-05-10 16:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-10 17:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-10 17:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-10 18:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 18:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-10 19:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-10 19:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 19:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-10 20:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 20:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-10 20:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 21:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-11 3:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-12 14:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-13 21:15 ` [PATCH] slub: Make CONFIG_PAGE_ALLOC work with new fastpath Christoph Lameter
2011-05-13 21:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 18:07 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 33502] New: Caught 64-bit read from uninitialized memory in __alloc_skb Christoph Lameter
2011-05-10 16:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-19 17:09 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DAE7579.3020400@cs.helsinki.fi \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=casteyde.christian@free.fr \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vegardno@ifi.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).