From: WeipingPan <panweiping3@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is 802.3ad mode in bonding useful ?
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:59:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBAC442.6050706@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110429104342.GA22387@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
On 04/29/2011 06:43 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:17:48AM +0800, WeipingPan wrote:
>> On 04/28/2011 08:21 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:33:50PM +0800, WeipingPan wrote:
>>>> Hi, all,
>>>>
>>>> 802.3ad mode in bonding implements 802.3ad standard.
>>>>
>>>> I am just wondering 802.3ad mode is useful,
>>>> since bonding has many modes like balance-rr, active-backup, etc.
>>>>
>>> Yes, of course its usefull. For switches which support 802.3ad, this mode
>>> allows for both peers to understand that the links in the bond are acting as an
>>> aggregate, which makes it easier to prevent things like inadvertently looped
>>> back frames, for which the other modes have to have all sorts of hacks to
>>> prevent.
>> What is looped back frames here ?
> In this case they are frames that get received by the bond, which the bond
> itself sent. In modes where more than one slave is active, and in which the
> switch has no additional knoweldge of the aggregate (e.g. round robin mode), the
> bond can send a frame on one slave, which the switch may broadcast to all ports,
> causing the frame just sent by the bond to then get received on another slave.
>
>> I didn't see any special code to handle looped back frames in other
>> modes in bonding,
>> can you take an example ?
>>
> See bond_handle_frame.
>
> Neil
>
Oh, I got it.
Thanks for your clear explanation !
Weiping Pan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-28 7:33 Is 802.3ad mode in bonding useful ? WeipingPan
2011-04-28 12:21 ` Neil Horman
[not found] ` <0FBC7C9C2640634A8B837C2EFFCFF32F0184732D72@SHEXMB-01.global.atheros.com>
2011-04-28 13:23 ` 答复: " Neil Horman
2011-04-29 3:17 ` WeipingPan
2011-04-29 10:43 ` Neil Horman
2011-04-29 13:59 ` WeipingPan [this message]
2011-04-29 14:04 ` John Lumby
2011-04-29 15:21 ` Rick Jones
2011-04-29 17:01 ` Jay Vosburgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DBAC442.6050706@gmail.com \
--to=panweiping3@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).