From: Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com, jchapman@katalix.com
Subject: Re: ip_queue_xmit() used illegally
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 17:10:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC463C7.5030407@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110506.132129.59693228.davem@davemloft.net>
On 05/06/2011 04:21 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 12:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
>
>> SCTP stores it's binding information using transports and assosciations
>> and does not fill in the ->inet_{daddr,saddr} values.
>>
>> It tries to work around this route issue by checking dst->obsolete
>> directly in sctp_packet_transmit(), which just makes the race smaller
>> and does not eliminate it. ip_queue_xmit() can still end up with
>> __sk_dst_check() returning NULL and then we end up emitting a
>> potentially bogus packet.
>
> I take this back, we added this hack where things like SCTP can
> pre-route the packet by hooking up the route to the SKB before
> calling ->queue_xmit.
>
> And L2TP does something similar.
>
> So false alarm, nothing to see here :-)
>
> I still want to clean this up so that this kind of stuff can be
> handled generically inside of ->queue_xmit() by passing in the correct
> addressing information.
>
Wow, You had me scrambling there for a while. I was just about to send note
about the pre-hooked route, but you beat me to it.
The reason why sctp doesn't change the inet_addr, is because that address can theoretically
change on ever packet transmit due to multi-homing nature of SCTP.
I'll take a look at ->queue_xmit() to see if SCTP can convert to using that.
-vlad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-06 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-06 19:26 ip_queue_xmit() used illegally David Miller
2011-05-06 20:21 ` David Miller
2011-05-06 21:10 ` Vladislav Yasevich [this message]
2011-05-06 21:28 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DC463C7.5030407@hp.com \
--to=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jchapman@katalix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).