From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Koki Sanagi Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: tracepoint of net_dev_xmit sees freed skb and causes panic Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:03:51 +0900 Message-ID: <4DE86B37.4070704@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1306854867.11899.31.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110602.135913.2065173997860104604.davem@davemloft.net> <1307048512.3667.28.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110602.140426.765650914977149734.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, mingo@elte.hu, fweisbec@gmail.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, tglx@linutronix.de, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110602.140426.765650914977149734.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org (2011/06/03 6:04), David Miller wrote: > From: Steven Rostedt > Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:01:52 -0400 > >> On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 13:59 -0700, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Steven Rostedt >>> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 11:14:27 -0400 >>> >>>> Note, the subject should not be "ftrace:", but "net:" or maybe even >>>> "net/tracing", as this really has nothing to do with ftrace code. The >>>> tracepoints are more generic than ftrace. >>> >>> Do you guys mind if I take this in via the net-2.6 tree? >> >> I have no issue with that. Heck, I prefer it. > > Great, thanks! O.K. I will resubmit this patch with appropriate subject "net/tracing:" Thanks, Koki Sanagi